Teams

3.0 PTC Alley Cats W18S

2024 SPRING Adult 18 & Over - CAZ · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-03-18vs Spring 3.0 PTC Heat Strokes W18SLost 14
L#1 DoublesDonna Haskell / Keri Stelle vs Christie Lukes / Kaili Fuller0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLucia Lipari vs Ashley Carroll6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJill Hicks / Monique Patel vs Courtney Skvarla / Julie Aguilar0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesVianka Villa vs Claire Nelson2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMarianne Banales / Heidi Maxwell vs Rhonda Campbell / Alicia Ryan0-6, 0-6
2024-03-04vs 3.0 OCO Village Vixens W18SWon 41
W#1 DoublesJamison Harvey / Kaitlin Stephens-Rich vs Connie Rosenberger / Amanda Breuer7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLucia Lipari vs Betty Holly6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Blum / Donna Haskell vs Diana LeDonne / Erika Mitsuyuki7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesVianka Villa vs Stephanie McLeod6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMansi Sarihan / Heidi Maxwell vs Kelly Woods / Amber Golden6-0, 6-1
2024-02-19vs Spring 3.0 PTC Heat Strokes W18SLost 05
L#1 DoublesJamison Harvey / Amy Adkins vs Julie Aguilar / Kaili Fuller1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesLucia Lipari vs Andrea Regan3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaitlin Stephens-Rich / Emily Blum vs Courtney Skvarla / Christie Lukes1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesVianka Villa vs Claire Nelson6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMonique Patel / Mansi Sarihan vs Sharon Cardoza / Rhonda Campbell2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Lucia Lipari
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.91
Emily Blum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Jessie Li
published
2.81
Keri Stelle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Jamison Harvey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Amy Adkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.08
Heidi Maxwell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Donna Haskell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jill Hicks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kaitlin Stephens-Rich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mansi Sarihan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marianne Banales
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Monique Patel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Vianka Villa
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Maxwell + Marianne Banales2536% games−3.7% vs expected
Kaitlin Stephens-Rich + Vianka Villa2542% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Maxwell + Donna Haskell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lucia Lipari
27W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Emily Blum
17W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
2.91
Jessie Li
25W–90L career · no lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
2.89
Keri Stelle
11W–21L career · 1 line in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Jamison Harvey
49W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Amy Adkins
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
12%87%1%
2.66
Heidi Maxwell
5W–18L career · 8 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Donna Haskell
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jill Hicks
12W–30L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kaitlin Stephens-Rich
10W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mansi Sarihan
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marianne Banales
7W–32L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Monique Patel
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Vianka Villa
4W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.