Teams

BRMST RED

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-21vs RCC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesDinelle Churin / Stephanie Haskett vs Lesley Johs / Jessica Bruny6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesElla Nazzaro vs Sara Wang0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLindsay Roberts / Julia Occhuizzo vs Barbara Cole / Kylie McBride1-6, 1-6
2025-05-20vs CVTA NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesDinelle Churin / Lindsay Roberts vs Biljana Blizanac / Jennifer Hotka5-0
W#1 SinglesJamie Block vs Amy Scheff6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElla Nazzaro / Maria Boutrous vs Susan Despotopulos / Jo Kim6-2, 6-3
2025-05-18vs MEA GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesDinelle Churin / Ella Nazzaro vs Mariah Quish / Sara Preston6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLindsay Roberts vs Jessica Catlin4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJulia Occhuizzo / Stephanie Haskett vs Susan Dalgleish / Jen Bryan6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-04-30vs TTA BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Nelson / Lindsay Roberts vs Heather Gardner / SONJA STANLEY2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDinelle Churin vs Kelly Weinland2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMaria Boutrous / Jamie Block vs Chasta Labass / Amanda Blake7-6, 7-6
2025-04-23vs NJ ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Haskett / Kimberly Nelson vs Meghan Disch / McKenzie Grace3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJulia Occhuizzo vs Jolene Harrelson1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJamie Block / Maria Boutrous vs Emily Gibson / Amanda Fischer6-2, 7-5
2025-04-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesDinelle Churin / Stephanie Haskett vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings60 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WP-C YELLOW7026924260
2SS-D RED6128721278
3ATC GREEN61251025243
4LEBTC PINK6126925255
5SS-LT GOLD6126926265
6BCC YELLOW61241126265
7CPV RED61241129278
8WP BLUE61221330279
9RHCC YELLOW5123718201
10LTC-M ORANGE51191127235
11VC PINK5226925251
12KC-RH ORANGE52241128255
13BM BLUE52231230261
14LTFC ORANGE52221331268
15HV SILVER52211432283
16DTP PINK52201533311
17SS-LGT YELLOW52241134310
18CM ORANGE52191637307
19BRMST RED42161430229
20MC NAVY42161430251
21RHCC ORANGE43221332252
22TTA PINK43191635302
23KNO RED43201535282
24CHCC GOLD43181737311
25SKY GREY43181737313
26EM YELLOW43181738308
27SKY YELLOW43181740306
28GAC PURPLE43161940306
29SS-LT RED43152041333
30BCC GOLD43181741315
31SS-HP BLUE43171841328
32WC BLUE43152046360
33FOX NAVY34211433291
34PCC SILVER34171840312
35WC RED34161941300
36CACM BLUE34142148352
37GR SILVER34132248318
38CM TEAL34122352337
39NJ ORANGE24151531261
40MVCC PURPLE24141636279
41CVTA NAVY2492145320
42KC-CC PINK25161942314
43WP-O RED25152043314
44DTP NAVY25161944334
45RMTC BLACK25152044328
46CVTA ORANGE25132248348
47SS-LT TEAL25132248339
48PCC GOLD25122349358
49BCST NAVY16122349343
50SS-H RED16112450347
51LEBTC GOLD16112450334
52GPTC RED16112451331
53KC-RH GREEN16102552356
54SH GOLD16102553372
55CVTA BLACK16102553374
56SS-H GREY16122353369
57SS-D BLUE1662961389
58BCC ORANGE0662449322
59DCHS YELLOW0792653361
60LAC BLUE0772858378

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Kimberly Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Lindsay Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.42
Dinelle Churin
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.39
Jamie Block
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.21
Stephanie Haskett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.21
Ella Nazzaro
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.19
Maria Boutrous
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.97
Julia Occhuizzo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Haskett + Dinelle Churin8259% games+9.5% vs expected
Lindsay Roberts + Dinelle Churin3257% games+8.6% vs expected
Jamie Block + Maria Boutrous7061% games+6.7% vs expected
Jamie Block + Ella Nazzaro4154% games−2.0% vs expected
Maria Boutrous + Ella Nazzaro2348% games−7.5% vs expected
Julia Occhuizzo + Ella Nazzaro3347% games−8.3% vs expected
Kimberly Nelson + Stephanie Haskett4750% games−15.6% vs expected
Stephanie Haskett + Lindsay Roberts224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Nelson
25W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.90
Lindsay Roberts
23W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%47%53%
2.51
2.5
Dinelle Churin
36W–47L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%71%29%
2.42
Jamie Block
18W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.39
Stephanie Haskett
24W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Ella Nazzaro
17W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Maria Boutrous
22W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Julia Occhuizzo
7W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.