Teams

Lovsness/Rigby

2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Combined

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-08vs SamplesWon 30
W#1 DoublesCharles Welton / Bekah Lovsness vs Lisa LaRose / Marvin Bohnenkamp6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKatie Ackermann / Paul Ackermann vs Lisa Jett / Jim Schwartz6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathryn Neale / Malik Hagens vs Kelly Samples / Bob Samples6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2024-08-01vs ShafferWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatie Ackermann / Paul Ackermann vs Andrea Layton / Steven Dingus2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Rigby / Bryan Rigby vs Michelle Scott / Joe Alonzo Jr6-4, 7-6
2024-08-01vs STL/Huff/18&Over7.0MXDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathryn Neale / Charles Welton vs Emily Desloge / Aditya Gupta4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKatie Ackermann / Alex Boker vs Brooke Cusumano Cacciarelli / Chris Cacciarelli6-0, 6-1
2024-07-23vs FarmersOnly.Com (Shouldis)Won 30
W#1 DoublesBekah Lovsness / Malik Hagens vs Mary Moore / Azher Sameer5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Winkler / Bryan Rigby vs Melissa Upson / Dwayne Upson6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKatie Ackermann / Eric Abramson vs Martina Augsburger / Smeet Merchant6-2, 6-0
2024-06-25vs STL/Huff/18&Over7.0MXDLost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Rigby / Paul Ackermann vs Emily Desloge / Sam Edwards3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKathryn Neale / Bryan Rigby vs Jordan Block / Joel Pottebaum4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBekah Lovsness / Malik Hagens vs Brooke Cusumano Cacciarelli / Chris Cacciarelli6-1, 6-2
2024-06-18vs ShafferWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Winkler / Bryan Rigby vs Elizabeth Lueg / Steven Dingus6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBekah Lovsness / Malik Hagens vs Laura Millkamp / Trey Shaffer6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKathryn Neale / Alex Boker vs Renee Breer / Daniel Tumminello6-1, 6-2
2024-06-11vs FarmersOnly.Com (Shouldis)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMalik Hagens / Kelly Winkler vs Melissa Upson / Dwayne Upson6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEric Abramson / Sarah Rigby vs Kara Karraker / Sam Shouldis4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaul Ackermann / Bekah Lovsness vs Leah Stroebel / Smeet Merchant7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2024-05-30vs SamplesLost 12
L#1 DoublesPaul Ackermann / Sarah Rigby vs Nathan Meinert / Mindy Meinert2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCharles Welton / Kathryn Neale vs David Dye / Lisa LaRose6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBryan Rigby / Katie Ackermann vs Jim Schwartz / Lisa Jett7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.0 Combined
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1STL/Huff/18&Over7.0MXD6215925199
2Lovsness/Rigby5316819162
3Samples53121229204
4FarmersOnly.Com (Shouldis)44131128235
5Shaffer0842043262

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Eric Abramson
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
3.84
Malik Hagens
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.84
Alex Boker
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.79
Charles Welton
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Paul Ackermann
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
Bryan Rigby
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.15
Kathryn Neale
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.75
Bekah Lovsness
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.50
Katie Ackermann
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.44
Sarah Rigby
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Ackermann + Sarah Rigby044 matchesnot enough data
Katie Ackermann + Eric Abramson404 matchesnot enough data
Malik Hagens + Bekah Lovsness314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eric Abramson
102W–43L career · 13 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.88
Malik Hagens
118W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Alex Boker
48W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Charles Welton
108W–76L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Paul Ackermann
72W–95L career · 9 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.70
4
Bryan Rigby
67W–60L career · 9 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
Kathryn Neale
41W–41L career · 5 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
3
Bekah Lovsness
27W–25L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Katie Ackermann
23W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
2.50
Sarah Rigby
55W–90L career · 4 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.