Teams

Thomasville

2024 Bainbridge Southern Combo 40 & Over - Fall · 8.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.88 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-08-28vs Thomasville/ThriffileyWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Eubanks / Stacy Chick vs Tiffany Jones / Melissa Johnson9-8
2024-08-28vs Thomasville/ThriffileyLost 01
L#2 DoublesRhonda Tullos / Elaine Rudd vs Shannon West / Kim Thriffiley3-5
2024-08-28vs Thomasville/ThriffileyWon 10
W#2 DoublesRhonda Tullos / Anna Lee vs Shannon West / Kim Thriffiley8-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Elizabeth Murray
published 4
Anna Lee
published 4
3.71
Lisa Graganella
published
3.64
Stacy Chick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Michelle Eubanks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Rhonda Tullos
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.51
Kim Thriffiley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Tricia Szwarc
published
3.32
Elaine Rudd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Anna Jones
published 4
Cathy Kendall
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elaine Rudd + Rhonda Tullos181448% games+3.4% vs expected
Elaine Rudd + Kim Thriffiley192748% games+0.8% vs expected
Stacy Chick + Michelle Eubanks432852% games−5.8% vs expected
Kim Thriffiley + Rhonda Tullos31437% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Eubanks + Rhonda Tullos5259% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Eubanks + Kim Thriffiley2351% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Eubanks + Elaine Rudd123 matchesnot enough data
Anna Jones + Lisa Graganella303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Murray
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Anna Lee
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Graganella
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Stacy Chick
59W–50L career · 1 line in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Michelle Eubanks
157W–99L career · 1 line in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Rhonda Tullos
237W–248L career · 5 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.59
Kim Thriffiley
144W–202L career · 3 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.51
Tricia Szwarc
19W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.50
3.5
Elaine Rudd
185W–162L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
4
Anna Jones
8W–1L career · no lines in 2024
95%5%<1%
3.28
3.5
Cathy Kendall
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.