Teams

Pace Queens/Ryken-Morrow/Paseo

2026 Adult 18+ SFV WD · SFV 18+ WeekDay - 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesCheryl Morrow / September Ryken vs Aimee Alejandre / Kiki Alejandre1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Orwin vs Michelle Tesoro6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDeborah Chediak / Kio Novina vs Pauline McLean / Stefanie Wah6-7, 3-6
2026-05-28vs Fireballs/Audeon-Slaughter/BalboaSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMarah Hogendorn / Kio Novina vs Kathleen Foy-Asaro / Carrie Gasper6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSandy Mandel vs Margery Teller6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCheryl Morrow / September Ryken vs Maryann Brandon / Shizuko Takayasu2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSalisa Wagner / Monica Kaplan vs Tracy HASBANIAN / Adele Slaughter5-7, 3-6
W#1 DoublesMarah Hogendorn / Sandy Mandel vs Alicia Harris / Ashlee Belfiore6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSalisa Wagner vs Ida Kim0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSeptember Ryken / Angelina Smith vs Siao Greene / Tammy Sue Roberts6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDeborah Chediak / Jennifer Orwin vs Grace Rodriguez / Mariam Brown6-3, 6-2
L#1 DoublesMarah Hogendorn / Sandy Mandel vs Christine Russell / Jessie Young4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAngelina Smith vs Aparna Bhargava4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDeborah Chediak / September Ryken vs Vanessa Rodriguez / Jo Ann Thrailkill2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAmanjot Bawa / Salisa Wagner vs Helen McCusker / Amelia Stephenson3-6, 2-6
2026-05-07vs Triple Doubles/Yang/MHCCLost 13
W#1 DoublesSandy Mandel / Marah Hogendorn vs Gina Caruso / Aniko Hill7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJennifer Orwin vs Mia Tinari1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCheryl Morrow / Angelina Smith vs Christine de la Hoz / Sari Megan Kern6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPenny Oxciano / September Ryken vs Britnie Ben-Porat / Neda Javaherian0-6, 1-6
2026-04-30vs Volley Llamas/Lassoff/BalboaLost 13
L#1 DoublesSandy Mandel / Jennifer Orwin vs Celeste Nameth / Nataliya Padilla5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMarah Hogendorn vs Francesca Gill6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCheryl Morrow / September Ryken vs Kathleen Hipps / Kristen Stills1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAngelina Smith / Deborah Chediak vs April Thrun / Cindy Shih6-0, 7-6
2026-04-24vs Sets in the City/Momary-Puno/PaseoLost 04
L#1 DoublesMarah Hogendorn / Natie MacDonald vs Tracy Kuncar / Peggy Perazzo7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSandy Mandel vs Dorothy Chung0-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesCheryl Morrow / September Ryken vs Marisela Momary / Lisa Vaughn1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmanjot Bawa / Kio Novina vs Dalia Sedra / Vanessa Mitchell6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-04-16vs Baseline Babes/Vastano-Ryan/PaseoLost 04
L#1 DoublesSandy Mandel / Marah Hogendorn vs Ying Tang / Venita Ryan6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSalisa Wagner vs Melanie Delgado7-5, 6-6
L#2 DoublesNatie MacDonald / Kio Novina vs Diana Amado / Rocio Anderson5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSeptember Ryken / Deborah Chediak vs Leslie Vastano / Gina Bongiovanni5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 DoublesMarah Hogendorn / Sandy Mandel vs Rayya Cooke / Susan Schechter6-0, 7-6
W#1 SinglesJackie Larsen vs Anngel Benoun6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDeborah Chediak / Kio Novina vs Helene Reinman / Carole Mueller6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSalisa Wagner / Monica Kaplan vs Connie Benveniste / Wendy Nickerson6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · SFV 18+ WeekDay - 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SFV LLW Aces and Laces/Afshari-Alejandre/Calabasas8130620246
2SF Volley Girls/McCusker-Thrailkill/Burbank8127924267
3Sets in the City/Momary-Puno/Paseo63231334307
4Baseline Babes/Vastano-Ryan/Paseo63211538331
5Calabasas Tennis Crew/Green-Roberts/Mika's63171946324
6Volley Llamas/Lassoff/Balboa54181841326
7Triple Doubles/Yang/MHCC36171943326
8Pace Queens/Ryken-Morrow/Paseo27102653370
9Fireballs/Audeon-Slaughter/Balboa18102655387
10String Theory/Schechter-Benveniste/Calabasas0972961398

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Marah Hogendorn
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 3.5
3.35
Kio Novina
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Salisa Wagner
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
Sandy Mandel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Jennifer Orwin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.15
Deborah Chediak
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3
3.13
Monica Kaplan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Natie MacDonald
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
Angelina Smith
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.86
September Ryken
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.72
Jackie Larsen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.68
Amanjot Bawa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Penny Oxciano
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angelina Smith + Deborah Chediak5068% games+16.4% vs expected
Sandy Mandel + Marah Hogendorn8357% games+7.3% vs expected
Jennifer Orwin + Deborah Chediak10459% games+5.9% vs expected
Monica Kaplan + Salisa Wagner3448% games−7.4% vs expected
Monica Kaplan + September Ryken51040% gamesnot enough data
Penny Oxciano + Jackie Larsen134 matchesnot enough data
Monica Kaplan + Kio Novina303 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Mandel + Kio Novina213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Marah Hogendorn
39W–15L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Kio Novina
164W–117L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Salisa Wagner
66W–62L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Sandy Mandel
70W–85L career · 8 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.18
Jennifer Orwin
32W–15L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.16
3
Deborah Chediak
30W–16L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.15
3.5
Monica Kaplan
43W–94L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.13
Natie MacDonald
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Angelina Smith
14W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
3.5
September Ryken
81W–221L career · 8 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.86
3
Jackie Larsen
17W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Amanjot Bawa
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
2.68
Penny Oxciano
8W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.