Teams

Jordan

2023 Norfolk Tri-Level 18 & Over · 2023 Norfolk Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-12-11vs ClaxtonLost 01
L#2 DoublesFlurry Yanez / Suzanne Anderson vs Michella Newton / Courtney Violette4-6, 4-6
2023-12-05vs TewWon 10
W#2 DoublesErin Camden / Megan Farr vs Sara Dailey / Kimberly Havener6-3, 6-2
2023-12-04vs RaulstonLost 02
L#2 DoublesSheryl Harris / Anastasia Kezman vs Ali Jones / Mary Snowden-Gordon3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMegan Farr / Erin Camden vs Joan Corkery / Sheila Filipponi1-6, 3-6
2023-12-01vs ClaxtonWon 10
W#2 DoublesFlurry Yanez / Suzanne Anderson vs Lisa Deaver / Courtney Violette5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-11-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesFlurry Yanez / Sheryl Harris vs Ali Jones / Anja Rodriguez1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-11-10vs ClaxtonSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAnastasia Kezman / Stacy Hennessy vs Caroline Dozier / Courtney Violette1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesErin Camden / Megan Farr vs Michella Newton / Shannon Halter7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2023-11-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesAnastasia Kezman / Stacy Hennessy vs Yuli Reams / Cindy Aston1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-10-30vs ClaxtonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Anderson / Flurry Yanez vs Elizabeth Hope / Shannon Halter7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesErin Camden / Megan Farr vs Tessa Robinson / Carrie Yuill6-7, 0-6
2023-10-17vs TewWon 10
W#2 DoublesErin Camden / Megan Farr vs Kathie Hart / Karla Smith6-4, 6-1
2023-10-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnastasia Kezman / Tijen Ireland vs Cheryl Zigrang / Yuli Reams6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2023 Norfolk Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Adelle Yanez
published 4.5
4.28
Kelly Martone
published
4.00
Laurie Marshall
published
3.79
Anastasia Kezman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Flurry Yanez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Sheryl Harris
published
3.43
Megan Farr
published
3.35
Erin Camden
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Laurie Gigliotti
published
Stacy Hennessy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Farr + Erin Camden134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Adelle Yanez
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
4.35
Kelly Martone
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
4.28
Laurie Marshall
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Anastasia Kezman
128W–47L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Flurry Yanez
51W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.72
Sheryl Harris
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.65
Megan Farr
23W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Erin Camden
141W–91L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.35
Laurie Gigliotti
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stacy Hennessy
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.