Teams

Breakpoint

2026 Tri-Level Men · 3.5,3.0,2.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-12-14vs Solo Men's Tri 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSpike Vrusho / Alex Madeira vs Eric Foret / Jeff Conston7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-11-09vs Solo Men's Tri 4.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAlex Madeira / Spike Vrusho vs Marc Alston / Valen Zeltser2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGERALD PROTHEROE / Tim Dumbleton vs Prabhas Viswanathan / Todd Redl0-6, 3-6
2025-11-02vs Solo Men's Tri 4.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesAlex Madeira / Tim Dumbleton vs John Sirman / Eric Foret1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Hunt / Brian Walker vs Todd Redl / Anthony Frangione6-4, 7-6
2025-09-28vs DRC - Die Tri-ingLost 02
L#2 DoublesBrian Walker / Bing Yang vs Thomas Cassidy / Todd Redl1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDennis Giauque / Joseph Lamerson vs David Diaz / James Casey1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5,3.0,2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Shawn Holzmann
published
3.60
Alex Madeira
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.57
Nicholas Godec
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Blake Gingerich
published 3.5
3.06
Ron Kimberling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Spike Vrusho
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.85
GERALD PROTHEROE
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
Brian Ackley
published 3
Daniel Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
David Held
published 3
Dennis Giauque
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Tim Dumbleton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Joseph Lamerson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
David Bresnahan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.57
Gabriel Panadero
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.41
Bing Yang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.39
Brian Walker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Meir Amar
published
ROBERT STEVENS
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Held + Bing Yang0626% games−11.8% vs expected
ROBERT STEVENS + Bing Yang134 matchesnot enough data
GERALD PROTHEROE + David Bresnahan134 matchesnot enough data
Spike Vrusho + GERALD PROTHEROE123 matchesnot enough data
GERALD PROTHEROE + Blake Gingerich213 matchesnot enough data
Bing Yang + Brian Walker033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shawn Holzmann
60W–22L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%1%
4.21
3.5
Alex Madeira
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.60
Nicholas Godec
66W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.57
3.5
Blake Gingerich
14W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ron Kimberling
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
Spike Vrusho
46W–39L career · 8 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
GERALD PROTHEROE
47W–58L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
2.85
3
Brian Ackley
2W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Daniel Hunt
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
David Held
1W–34L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Dennis Giauque
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Tim Dumbleton
12W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
Joseph Lamerson
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
2.67
3
David Bresnahan
20W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.61
2.5
Gabriel Panadero
3W–8L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%30%70%
2.57
3
Bing Yang
10W–41L career · 1 line in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.41
2.5
Brian Walker
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.39
Meir Amar
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
ROBERT STEVENS
4W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.