Teams

Yadkin/Jennings/18+3.0

2025 Yadkin Valley Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women-Tuesday (night)

15 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-13vs Yadkin/Keller-Stevens/WW/18 3.0Split 22
W#1 DoublesSarah Osadnick / Nikki Francis vs Virginia Pleasants / Carrie Haberkost3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesColleen Isaacson / Torin Liberthson-Brown vs Hillary Stevens / Jennifer Keller3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesWhitney Newell vs Temple Steele3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChanel Griggs / Chenequa Ceasar vs Karen Lehman / Kate Aubuchon6-4, 7-5
2025-04-22vs Yadkin/Keller-Stevens/WW/18 3.0Won 31
W#1 DoublesColleen Isaacson / Sarah Kaplan vs Virginia Pleasants / Jenny Orr6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSarah Osadnick vs Hillary Stevens6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Long / Lela Ray vs Sarah Chandler / Temple Steele6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAlathea Thompson Baker / Natalie Jennings vs Kate Aubuchon / REBECCA SELF6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-04-01vs Yadkin/Keller-Stevens/WW/18 3.0Split 22
W#1 SinglesSarah Osadnick vs Hillary Stevens6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNatalie Jennings / Lela Ray vs Sarah Chandler / Virginia Pleasants4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesChanel Griggs vs Temple Steele7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlathea Thompson Baker / Chenequa Ceasar vs Sarah Blackwell / Carrie Haberkost2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-11vs Yadkin/Keller-Stevens/WW/18 3.0Split 22
W#1 DoublesColleen Isaacson / Torin Liberthson-Brown vs Virginia Pleasants / Sarah Chandler6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNikki Francis / Amy Braden vs Hillary Stevens / Jenny Orr6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSarah Osadnick vs Sarah Blackwell6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesChanel Griggs / Chenequa Ceasar vs Carrie Haberkost / Jennifer Keller6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women-Tuesday (night) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Ashley Peters
published 3.5
3.30
Sarah Kaplan
published
3.15
Julie Long
published
3.04
Colleen Isaacson
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.91
Nikki Francis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
Kristie Moesner
published
2.79
Whitney Newell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.77
Lela Ray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Alathea Thompson Baker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Amy Braden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Chanel Griggs
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.60
Chenequa Ceasar
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.58
Torin Liberthson-Brown
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Natalie Jennings
published
Sarah Osadnick
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Braden + Torin Liberthson-Brown123 matchesnot enough data
Amy Braden + Whitney Newell213 matchesnot enough data
Chanel Griggs + Chenequa Ceasar123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Peters
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Sarah Kaplan
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Julie Long
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
3
Colleen Isaacson
29W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
Nikki Francis
16W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Kristie Moesner
21W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Whitney Newell
13W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Lela Ray
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Alathea Thompson Baker
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Amy Braden
23W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Chanel Griggs
11W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Chenequa Ceasar
4W–21L career · 10 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Torin Liberthson-Brown
11W–39L career · 7 lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
2.58
Natalie Jennings
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Osadnick
13W–6L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.