Teams

SC-Marvel

2021 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 MEN

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-06-05vs SC-WillmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesJerry Henderson / John Bumgarner vs Mark Gardner / Doug Bost7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBill Schoultz / Kevin Collins vs Michael Mainer / Sri Purohith3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesClinton Marvel / Michael McLauchlin vs Eric Seaman / Andrew Anderson2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-06-05vs PC-MarshallWon 21
W#1 DoublesJerry Henderson / John Bumgarner vs Marc Spinner / Mark Sullivan4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBill Schoultz / Kevin Collins vs Paul McDaniel / Bryan Coles4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesClinton Marvel / Michael McLauchlin vs Moe Davari / Kent Ozkardesh6-4, 6-0
2021-06-04vs WRAC-WoodwardLost 12
W#1 DoublesJerry Henderson / John Bumgarner vs Bryan Noyd / Michael Bendtsen6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBill Schoultz / Shawn Woodard vs Richard Lynn / Keith Koch1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesClinton Marvel / Michael McLauchlin vs Chester Granard / Jim Kellogg4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.0 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IND-Mehlenbacher40111683
2WRAC-Woodward12361281
3SC-Marvel12361393
4SC-Johnson0411123137

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Clinton Marvel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Bill Schoultz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Jerry Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Bumgarner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin Collins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shawn Woodard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Clinton Marvel + Bill Schoultz5360% games+11.9% vs expected
Jerry Henderson + Clinton Marvel7750% games−2.8% vs expected
Jerry Henderson + Bill Schoultz71045% games−6.9% vs expected
Kevin Collins + Jerry Henderson7552% games−9.5% vs expected
Kevin Collins + Clinton Marvel4846% games−12.2% vs expected
Kevin Collins + Bill Schoultz1443% gamesnot enough data
Jerry Henderson + John Bumgarner2349% gamesnot enough data
Shawn Woodard + John Bumgarner224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Clinton Marvel
46W–57L career · 3 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Bill Schoultz
39W–37L career · 3 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
Jerry Henderson
54W–62L career · 3 lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
3.00
John Bumgarner
9W–16L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kevin Collins
29W–52L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Shawn Woodard
8W–18L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.