← Teams

WHRC-Hodgson

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.44 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Barbara Dusicka
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.56
Alena Lauritsen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Karen Harlow
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Cara Williams
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Whitney Mam
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Jennifer Potter
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Astrid Andreu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Tracey Hodgson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.92
Suzanne Friedman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
—
Rachel Emery
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 0
Results5 ties
2020-03-01Won 3–1
L#1 DoublesKaren Harlow / Astrid Andreu vs Jill Watson / Erin Ince7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTracey Hodgson / Barbara Dusicka vs Tamee Baffaro / Heidi Palena6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJennifer Potter vs Delena Palena6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRachel Emery / Whitney Mam vs Alisa Rakoz / Alena Ofuasia6-4, 6-4
2020-01-17Won 4–1
L#1 DoublesTracey Hodgson / Cara Williams vs Dar Dragoon / Jean Zuber Marshburn4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBarbara Dusicka vs Catherine Greenblatt6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRachel Emery / Whitney Mam vs Hilary Johnson / Julie LaMontagne6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJennifer Potter vs Christie Herkert6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAstrid Andreu / Karen Harlow vs Christine Egan / Sarah Larson6-3, 6-2
2020-01-12Lost 2–3
L#1 DoublesTracey Hodgson / Cara Williams vs Robin Walker / Megan Clifford6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJennifer Potter vs Michele Sutherland6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBarbara Dusicka / Whitney Mam vs Susan Gallegos / Susan Rolfe7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAlena Lauritsen vs Mary Green-Zwemke6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAstrid Andreu / Karen Harlow vs Erin Doucet / Shuping Li4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2020-01-04Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesWhitney Mam / Barbara Dusicka vs Rebecca Griffith / Rochelle Pluymers7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAlena Lauritsen vs Kourtnie Katayama5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Friedman / Rachel Emery vs Angela Diaz de Leon / Mikayla Posey6-0, 6-2
2019-12-14Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesPatrick Maginnis / Barbara Dusicka vs Vincent Lee / Mary Green-Zwemke7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCara Williams / Kevin Heller vs Cameron Hampton / Cheri Martes Davis6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Barbara Dusicka
97W–37L career
0%46%54%
3.62
3.5
Alena Lauritsen
129W–74L career
0%67%33%
3.56
3.5
Karen Harlow
80W–58L career
0%92%8%
3.43
3.5
Cara Williams
56W–42L career
3%95%1%
3.25
3.5
Whitney Mam
30W–27L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Jennifer Potter
38W–53L career
2%98%1%
3.24
3.5
Astrid Andreu
39W–28L career · type A
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Tracey Hodgson
29W–34L career · type A
19%81%0%
3.10
3
Suzanne Friedman
25W–28L career
0%88%12%
2.92
0
Rachel Emery
12W–7L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.