Teams

Brevard/Woods

2026 Brevard Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-20vs Fee - PriorWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Mesnard / Michelle Lawley vs Nicole Kendrick / Ashley St Vil6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDanielle Carlson vs Inez Prior6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmanda Mccaughin / Catherine Ferreira vs Madeline Calise / Carri Prior4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-05-13vs EFSC - OhlinWon 20
W#1 DoublesChonda Rodrigo-butler / Michelle Kne vs Mackenzie Sloan / Daniella Archer6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLynn Barratt / Michelle Lawley vs Gabriella Collura / Elizabeth Thorne6-1, 6-3
2026-04-29vs Kiwi - KonradLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Lawley / Lynn Barratt vs Laleh Sharifzadeh / Susan Hala3-6, 0-6
2026-04-18vs EFSC - OhlinWon 30
W#1 DoublesChonda Rodrigo-butler / Linda Mesnard vs Alix Amozig / Jenna Bajus6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDanielle Carlson vs Calli Ohlin6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Lawley / Catherine Ferreira vs Brianna Stevens / Mackenzie Sloan6-2, 6-1
2026-04-15vs Fee - PriorWon 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Mesnard / Catherine Ferreira vs Inez Prior / Natalie Happ3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMichelle Kne vs Nicole Kendrick6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLynn Barratt / Michelle Lawley vs Margaret Kendrick / Ashley St Vil6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.50
Lael Woods
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Danielle Carlson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.48
Chonda Rodrigo-butler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.35
Linda Mesnard
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.33
Lynn Barratt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Amanda Mccaughin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.21
Michelle Lawley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.18
Michelle Kne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.12
Catherine Ferreira
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Lawley + Lynn Barratt404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lael Woods
18W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50
2.5
Danielle Carlson
12W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
2.5
Chonda Rodrigo-butler
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%57%43%
2.48
Linda Mesnard
13W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.35
Lynn Barratt
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
2.5
Amanda Mccaughin
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Lawley
11W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Michelle Kne
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Catherine Ferreira
2W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.