Teams

LATA40/Doty/RC

2023 Mixed 40 & Over - USTA · 7.0 Adult Mixed Doubles

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-06vs LATA40/KLEEMOFF/LCTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrandon Doty / Tracy Huffman vs Ken Holmes / Gina Hilts4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-05-23vs LATA40/KWESCOTT/RCLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrandon Doty / Kelly Brown vs Barry Mathews / Jane Roberts4-6, 4-6
2023-05-16vs LATA40/Cherry/ SSPWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrandon Doty / Kelly Brown vs Todd Sweat / Carmen Goulet6-4, 6-3
2023-05-09vs LATA40/Harrison/SSPWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrandon Doty / June MacKie vs Randal Senn / Cindy Corley6-4, 6-4
2023-05-02vs LATA40/Hawsey/MWWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrandon Doty / June MacKie vs Michael Greene / Erica Bellonio6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Chris Sinegar
published 4
3.95
Kevin Felkel
published
3.86
Caroline King
published 4
3.85
Brandon Doty
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
3.62
MARTIN CATOLICO
published
3.57
Guy Wood
published
3.41
Brannon Hagins
published 3.5
3.23
Angie McCoy
published 3.5
3.12
Libby Hagins
published
2.50
Matthew Hallman
published
2.41
June MacKie
published
Tracy Huffman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brannon Hagins + Libby Hagins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Sinegar
29W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.98
Kevin Felkel
79W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.95
4
Caroline King
83W–29L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Brandon Doty
132W–68L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Amanda Willoughby
37W–15L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
MARTIN CATOLICO
14W–28L career · no lines in 2023
20%79%<1%
3.62
Guy Wood
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Brannon Hagins
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Angie McCoy
29W–14L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Libby Hagins
20W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.12
Matthew Hallman
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
June MacKie
11W–47L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.41
Tracy Huffman
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.