Teams

Ad.Whitten55A

2024 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-04-22vs Di.Abourisk55ASplit 11
L#2 DoublesKathy Bostrom / Adela Whitten vs Joy Cooper / Alacia Billow3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLori Hall / Mari Jameel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-15vs Ca.Conzola55ALost 01
L#2 DoublesMari Jameel / Noelle Schofield vs Camille Conzola / Julie Liddle2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-04-08vs Sy.Daigle55ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesKathy Garnier / Elaine Capriglione vs Brook Ayres / Sherry Ingle6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLori Elliott / Mari Jameel vs Heather Perry / Peggy Dobbins7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-04-01vs An.Ashburn55ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesJane Hunter / Kathy Garnier vs Lori Bourne / Jennifer Fogleman6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNoelle Schofield / Kathy Bostrom vs Deanna Drescher / Vicki Fritsch6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2024-03-25vs El.Osbourne55ALost 02
L#2 DoublesMary Kelly / Mari Jameel vs Joan Faulkner / Susana Harvey0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Smith / Kathy Bostrom vs Marina Barthalmus / Kathy Litwak4-6, 4-6
2024-03-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesMari Jameel / Adela Whitten vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-11vs Di.Williams55A3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesJane Hunter / Robin Sealey vs Gillian Kelleher / Laurie Reiss7-5, 6-4
2024-03-04vs Pa.Cochran55AWon 10
W#2 DoublesKathy Bostrom / Noelle Schofield vs Paula Cochran / Eleanor Jones6-1, 6-1
2024-02-26vs Su.Knowles55ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesElaine Capriglione / Robin Sealey vs Heidi Duggins / Sarah Schmalz1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Garnier / Patricia Smith vs Ann Willard / Maureen Nixon7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Jane Hunter
published
3.36
Robin Sealey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Noelle Schofield
published
3.09
Kathy Garnier
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Lori Hall
published
2.93
Kathy Bostrom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
Mari Jameel
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Garnier + Mari Jameel134 matchesnot enough data
Robin Sealey + Jane Hunter123 matchesnot enough data
Robin Sealey + Kathy Bostrom123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jane Hunter
16W–12L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Robin Sealey
64W–63L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
Noelle Schofield
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Kathy Garnier
16W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Lori Hall
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Kathy Bostrom
57W–83L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Mari Jameel
38W–56L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.