Teams

LCTA18/Smith/Wild Dunes

18 & Over · 18 & Over LLAS - Men 5.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.67 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-14vs PD18/Sintich/Byerly ParkWon 21
W#1 DoublesGeorge Clonts / William Wanner vs Garth Thomson / Jacob Sintich6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSean McNulty vs Luke Whiteside6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDakota Greathouse / Julian Tellez vs Abraham Lascari Diaz / Ryan Auger3-6, 0-6
2025-06-14vs LLAS UPTA18A/KennedyWon 21
L#1 DoublesSean McNulty / George Clonts vs Colton Morehart / Kyle Kennedy1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesWilliam Wanner vs Jadison Fioramosca6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDakota Greathouse / Julian Tellez vs Jeffrey Martin / Ben Bertino6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-13vs CTL18/Price/SVCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesGeorge Clonts / Sean McNulty vs Thomas Bryan / Jerry Price3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDonald Bruner / Dakota Greathouse vs Hayden Faulkenbury / Robert Anderson2-6, 6-7
2025-06-13vs LATA18/Hinson/LCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesGeorge Clonts / Sean McNulty vs William Lynch / Justin Downey2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBryce Richards vs DandaPoojith Reddy2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDonald Bruner / Dakota Greathouse vs William Wiggins / Sean Nguyen5-7, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over LLAS - Men 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.41 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.79
Donald Bruner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.50
Dave Welch
published 5
4.27
Dakota Greathouse
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
George Clonts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.23
Bryce Richards
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Julian Tellez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
PABLO BONO
published
Russell Norris
published
Sean McNulty
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
William Wanner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dave Welch + Dakota Greathouse6254% gamesnot enough data
Dakota Greathouse + Donald Bruner2356% gamesnot enough data
George Clonts + Sean McNulty033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Donald Bruner
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.79
5
Dave Welch
35W–22L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.50
4.5
Dakota Greathouse
49W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
George Clonts
37W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Bryce Richards
58W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Julian Tellez
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
PABLO BONO
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Russell Norris
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sean McNulty
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Wanner
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.