Teams

Shideler/BV/KTC

2024 Adult Singles 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 2.83 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-07vs Burleson/Rogers/KTCWon 21
W#1 SinglesAngela Paulk vs Serena Hampton6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesTina Shideler vs Jennifer Burleson1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesAnnemarie Porter vs Samantha Neel6-1, 6-2
2024-11-19vs Wilson/Rogers/SVCCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAngela Paulk vs Amy Colucci1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesTina Shideler vs Heidi Behnke6-2, 6-2
2024-11-17vs Burleson/Rogers/KTCLost 02
L#1 SinglesAudra Peterson vs Samantha Neel5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKristen Walnofer vs Jennifer Burleson0-6, 1-6
2024-11-10vs Wilson/Rogers/SVCCLost 02
L#1 SinglesAnnemarie Porter vs Amy Colucci2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAudra Peterson vs Samantha Gagliardo1-6, 0-6
2024-10-29vs Wilson/Rogers/SVCCLost 12
W#1 SinglesAnnemarie Porter vs Alida Fitzpatrick7-5, 6-1
L#2 SinglesTina Shideler vs Jamie Wilson3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAudra Peterson vs Amy Colucci0-6, 0-6
2024-10-23vs Burleson/Rogers/KTCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAngela Paulk vs Serena Hampton6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesKristen Walnofer vs Samantha Neel4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Annemarie Porter
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.82
Angela Paulk
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.29
Tina Shideler
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.23
Audra Peterson
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Kristen Walnofer
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Audra Peterson + Tina Shideler123 matchesnot enough data
Angela Paulk + Annemarie Porter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Annemarie Porter
22W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Angela Paulk
17W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Tina Shideler
11W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%94%6%
2.29
2.5
Audra Peterson
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.23
Kristen Walnofer
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.