Teams

Lopez - LGCC

2025 Shenandoah Adult 18 & Over Men · Shenandoah Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-12vs Alston - Gonia's GorillasSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPaul Ebersole / Scott Hataway vs Alex Saunders / Ted Michaels6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesDante Paragas vs John Kim3-6, 2-6
2025-05-31vs Jenkins - MTCWon 10
W#2 SinglesDante Paragas vs Todd Hathaway6-2, 7-5
2025-05-29vs Alston - Gonia's GorillasLost 02
L#1 DoublesDante Paragas / Scott Hataway vs Alex Saunders / Blake Cogbill6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPaul Ebersole / Michael Dunn vs Ahmad Salahuddin / Michael Alston3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-18vs HallWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoseph Babb / Dante Paragas vs Glenn Hall / Gene Ward6-1, 6-3
2025-04-26vs Jenkins - MTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesPaul Ebersole / Matthew Noordhoff vs Sean Crocker / Todd Hathaway7-5, 6-2
2025-04-12vs HallWon 10
W#2 DoublesPaul Ebersole / Michael Dunn vs Bahram Solhjou / Richard Gerhardt6-1, 6-4
L#1 DoublesPavan Gavarshetty / Dante Paragas vs Mike Ly / Jeffrey Gill0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Torben Svenningsen
published
3.46
Scott Hataway
published
3.42
Paul Ebersole
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Dante Paragas
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Joseph Babb
published
3.30
Michael Dunn
published
3.21
Matthew Noordhoff
published
3.15
Marcus Lopez
published
3.12
Pavan Gavarshetty
published
3.06
Chris Powers
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Torben Svenningsen + Marcus Lopez213 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Noordhoff + Marcus Lopez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Torben Svenningsen
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Scott Hataway
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Paul Ebersole
45W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Dante Paragas
72W–63L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Joseph Babb
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Michael Dunn
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Matthew Noordhoff
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Marcus Lopez
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.15
Pavan Gavarshetty
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Chris Powers
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.