Teams

Woodall 3.0 18

2025 Decatur Spring Adult 18 and Over 2.5W - 5.0 · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.80 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-01vs McTaggart 3.0 18Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKristi Overbee / Paige Dobbins vs Anna Mctaggart / Clesha Ward1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Bailie / Brooks Coley vs Cassandra Smith / Belinda Rossi3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-03-31vs McTaggart 3.0 18Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSusie Brock / Lilli Boone vs Jennifer Gidley / Clesha Ward3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDebbie Bailie / Paige Dobbins vs Brittnee Robinson / Cassandra Smith1-6, 2-6
2025-03-26vs McTaggart 3.0 18Split 11
L#1 DoublesCindy Perry / Paige Dobbins vs Clesha Ward / Diane Hubbard0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKristi Overbee / Erika Huber vs Cassandra Smith / Belinda Rossi7-5, 6-1
2025-03-12vs McTaggart 3.0 18Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSusie Brock / Debbie Bailie vs Jennifer Gidley / Andrea Cordes5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesBrittany Woodall vs Brittnee Robinson6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCindy Perry / Erika Huber vs Cassandra Smith / Cathleen Rupp1-6, 5-7
2025-03-10vs McTaggart 3.0 18Won 21
L#1 DoublesSusie Brock / Anna Smith Walton vs Clesha Ward / Andrea Cordes4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLilli Boone vs Brittnee Robinson6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrooks Coley / Debbie Bailie vs Cathleen Rupp / Kathy Roeske6-0, 6-2
2025-02-28vs McTaggart 3.0 18Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLilli Boone / Kristi Overbee vs Anna Mctaggart / Clesha Ward6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDebbie Bailie vs Diane Hubbard0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Perry / Melissa Kaiser vs Jennifer Gidley / Cassandra Smith2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Susie Brock
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
2.81
Anna Smith Walton
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Brittany Woodall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.68
Kristi Overbee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Brooks Coley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.34
Paige Dobbins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.34
Debbie Bailie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.30
Erika Huber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.29
Melissa Kaiser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.20
Cindy Perry
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Lilli Boone
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erika Huber + Cindy Perry1635% games−2.1% vs expected
Debbie Bailie + Cindy Perry2538% games−4.2% vs expected
Erika Huber + Paige Dobbins134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susie Brock
27W–32L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Anna Smith Walton
14W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Brittany Woodall
6W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristi Overbee
10W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.68
3
Brooks Coley
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
Paige Dobbins
5W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.34
2.5
Debbie Bailie
35W–32L career · 12 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.34
Erika Huber
22W–37L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
Melissa Kaiser
37W–67L career · 1 line in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
2.5
Cindy Perry
23W–60L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
Lilli Boone
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.