Teams

Penry/Knoxville

2025 Adult 55 & Over-Knoxville · 3.0 Adult 55 & over Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-19vs Daves/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarsha Standridge / Tricia Hixson vs Terri Bowers / Bonnie Hebert6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSarah Attkisson / Brenda Rayfield vs Diane Collier / Judy Housley2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Dayringer / Debbie Bryant vs Gail Rieger / Annette Thompson6-2, 6-1
2025-04-12vs Garrard/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesJudy Penry / Robbie Quilty vs Sandy Garrard / Linda Bui1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrenda Rayfield / Tricia Hixson vs Martha Wilds / Sue Mather1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJanis Crye / Linda Dayringer vs LISA PETTY / Martha Filipkowski7-5, 6-4
2025-04-05vs Daves/KnoxvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Attkisson / Brenda Rayfield vs Bonnie Hebert / Angela Rae Rhody6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJanis Crye / Debbie Bryant vs Bonney Daves / Kathleen Sinclair6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTricia Hixson / Lila Downs vs Susan Pappas / Marcia Bates6-1, 7-6
2025-03-29vs Yoder/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesJudy Penry / Diane Williams vs Karen Koester / Laila Yoder0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLila Downs / Sarah Attkisson vs Maggie Reynolds / Karen Bell6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTricia Hixson / Marsha Standridge vs Sherry Byington / Shelly Krummen4-6, 0-6
2025-03-22vs Garrard/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesLila Downs / Brenda Rayfield vs Helena Liuag / Martha Wilds5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTricia Hixson / Sarah Attkisson vs LISA PETTY / Sue Mather7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJanis Crye / Diane Williams vs Sandy Garrard / Ginger Arthur0-6, 4-6
2025-03-08vs Yoder/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesTricia Hixson / Sarah Attkisson vs Karen Watson / Lisa Smith5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLila Downs / Brenda Rayfield vs Gloria Palacios / Maggie Reynolds6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJanis Crye / Robbie Quilty vs Sherry Byington / Karen Koester0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.0 Adult 55 & over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Penry/Knoxville2481021175

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Lila Downs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.96
Janis Crye
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.81
Andrea Anderson
published 3
2.79
Linda Dayringer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Tricia Hixson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Brenda Rayfield
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.62
Sarah Attkisson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Judy Penry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marsha Standridge
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Robbie Quilty
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marsha Standridge + Tricia Hixson5347% games+2.7% vs expected
Sarah Attkisson + Brenda Rayfield2646% games−0.5% vs expected
Lila Downs + Brenda Rayfield3544% gamesnot enough data
Janis Crye + Linda Dayringer303 matchesnot enough data
Janis Crye + Tricia Hixson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lila Downs
18W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
Janis Crye
13W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Andrea Anderson
3W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Linda Dayringer
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
Tricia Hixson
16W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Brenda Rayfield
17W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
Sarah Attkisson
12W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.62
Judy Penry
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marsha Standridge
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robbie Quilty
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.