Teams

Team

2021 Tri Level · Tri LeveL WOMEN

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MONTANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-09-26vs All That!Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Spierling / Christine Caldwell vs Amy Johnson / Hailey Kern3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Brennan / Tara Jensen vs Willa Craig / Irma Spang4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-09-26vs All That!Won 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Caldwell / Kathy Hayes vs Sally Lentz / Amy Johnson1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Brennan / Trish Madsen vs Mary Bursack / Miki Fukushima3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-09-25vs All That!Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Spierling / Kathy Hayes vs Hailey Kern / Jill Roberts4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Brennan / Tara Jensen vs Irma Spang / Kathryn Kelly6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTrish Madsen / Shelly Johnson vs Willa Craig / Mary Bursack7-5, 6-4
2021-09-24vs All That!Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Spierling / Christine Caldwell vs Jill Roberts / Sally Lentz3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesShelly Johnson / Trish Madsen vs Willa Craig / Irma Spang7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Brennan / Tara Jensen vs AMY BELLAMAH-DANIEL / Miki Fukushima1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Tri LeveL WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Josh3063962
2Team03361396

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Elizabeth Brennan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Christine Caldwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Karen Spierling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shelly Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Tara Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Trish Madsen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelly Johnson + Trish Madsen5157% games+7.2% vs expected
Tara Jensen + Elizabeth Brennan033 matchesnot enough data
Trish Madsen + Elizabeth Brennan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Brennan
19W–18L career · 4 lines in 2021
68%32%<1%
3.44
3.5
Christine Caldwell
12W–7L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Karen Spierling
4W–15L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Shelly Johnson
13W–3L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tara Jensen
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Trish Madsen
13W–7L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.