Teams

Tate - weekends

2022 Winter Singles Flex League (YER) · 3.0 Women

1 player · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-06vs SHIELA K - WEEKENDWon 10
W#1 SinglesCassandra Tate vs Sheila Kirkegaard6-2, 6-0
2022-05-23vs ChioccoWon 10
W#1 SinglesCassandra Tate vs Annabella Chiocco4-6, 5-3
2022-05-19Won 10
W#1 SinglesCassandra Tate vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-07vs ElliottWon 10
W#1 SinglesCassandra Tate vs Camille Elliott6-4, 7-6
2022-02-13vs Counter 22Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCassandra Tate vs Mandi Counter1-6, 6-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings62 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Yow5050019
2N Park505004
3Richardson-Lander (daytime)5050132
4Coley5050119
5Counter 225050122
6Johansen - Daytime4141135
7Malanovich-flexible4141222
8LaMoria (Flexible)4141226
9Hutchinson4141220
10Carly Baker4141226
11Tate - weekends4141233
12META4141224
13Staddon-Smith (weekends)4141225
14N Thompson daytime4141226
15Lai4141330
16Fawcett (flexible)4141326
17Petzel4141328
18Brower(flexible)4141441
19Porter (daytime)3232331
20Ericksen Weekend3232320
21ASwiftney3232339
22Mathews (daytime)3232437
23Clithero (FLEXIBLE)3232434
24Newkirk Weekends3232432
25LIATI3232436
26Santodomingo (Daytime)3232546
27Ojendyk Weekends3232539
28Janson-daytime only2323543
29Willgerodt2323636
30Adams2323641
31Reudink (DAYTIME)2323644
32Schiller2323636
33Susanna Wilken2323640
34Shibafox (evening & weekend)2323648
35Chiocco2323640
36Elliott2323642
37TCSP-Lesirge2323741
38Winks2323742
39Marisa Webb2323745
40Schultze2323751
41Okamura (DAYTIME)2323749
42Lushashaka 3.01414746
43SHIELA K - WEEKEND1414750
44Donovan1414852
45Kryman1414848
46Krammer - Daytime1414857
47Beaudry1414852
48Clancy1414849
49MonicaF1414853
50Chua (flexible)1414845
51Jones1414952
52Blankenship (DAYTIME)1414958
53Hive Five - Qin1414958
54McMonigal1414955
55Marti's Team05051060
56DeGeorge (Daytime)05051059
57Golden flexible05051059
58Goldbloom05051060
59Sedghinasab05051060
60Ohashi 3.005051060
61Morse05051058
62Margot Sith05051059

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.49
Cassandra Tate
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cassandra Tate
55W–85L career · 5 lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.