Teams

SDNC 3.5 Kit Carson (3:2)/ Bristol

2024 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC WD · SDNC - Women- 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-06-03vs SDNC 3.5 El Camino CC (2:3)/ HeartLost 02
L#1 DoublesJanice Fernando / Tara MILBRAND vs Laney Mesquita / Nancy Sexton4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNahomi Kato / Rita Murphy vs Rosanna Balbo / Carolyn McCarty4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-05-20vs SDNC 3.5 Valley Center (3:2)/ ReeveSplit 11
W#2 DoublesHelen Greis / Mie Bennett vs Yolanda Christensen / Tara Jones6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKim Fearon / Nahomi Kato vs Liz Pledger / Maureen Duncan4-6, 2-6
2024-05-13vs SDNC 3.5 RSFTC (2:3)/ OrtelLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelly Lemker / Tara MILBRAND vs Tricia Bothmer / Diana Knickrehm2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesOnay Havens / Judy Webster vs Krista Young / Juliana Guillory6-7, 3-6
2024-05-06vs SDNC 3.5 La Valle CC (3:2)/ PretiSplit 11
L#2 DoublesArlene Hasegawa / Nahomi Kato vs Alexandra Avedisian / Tammy Lloyd1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMie Bennett / Helen Greis vs Kristin Norby / Jeanette Scott6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKelly Lemker / Janice Fernando vs Meg Dawson / Alison Pasiut5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesHelen Greis / Kim Fearon vs Lynn Heiman / Junli Feng1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesArlene Hasegawa / Christine Bristol vs Krystal Champion / Nichole Dolinsky0-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesTara MILBRAND / Suzanne E Shupe vs Kathy Colarusso / Christy Monko6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesOnay Havens / Judy Webster vs Cyndi Toscani / CASSANDRA CYRUS6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAlicia Gibson / Nahomi Kato vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-15vs SDNC 3.5 Kit Carson (3:2)/ LyLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Lemker / Tara MILBRAND vs Alissa Ly / Yekaterina Smotrich3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHelen Greis / Onay Havens vs Jessica Burden / Joyce Reading6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKim Fearon / Rita Murphy vs April Flak / Soo Chen0-6, 3-6
2024-04-08vs SDNC LLW 3.5WD Santaluz Club/ MeadLost 12
W#1 DoublesOnay Havens / Judy Webster vs Anna Maria Zamorano / Kristin DeWitt7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTara MILBRAND / Suzanne E Shupe vs Nancy Cirillo / Karen Schillinger6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKelly Lemker / Janice Fernando vs Melissa Mead / Sandra Uribe4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesSuzanne E Shupe / Kelly Lemker vs Jean McDonald / Bernadette Solberg6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesOnay Havens / Mie Bennett vs Diane Thornton / Lenore Gaddis5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesHelen Greis / Lori Lovering vs Joanne White / Karen Rose6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women- 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Mieko Kato
published
3.57
Lori Lovering
published 3.5
3.40
Onay Havens
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.36
Tara MILBRAND
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.36
Kelly Lemker
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.28
Suzanne E Shupe
published
3.21
Helen Greis
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
Mie Bennett
published
3.18
Christine Bristol
published 3.5
3.15
Kim Fearon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Rita Murphy
published
2.92
Nahomi Kato
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.69
Arlene Hasegawa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne E Shupe + Tara MILBRAND12553% games+2.7% vs expected
Helen Greis + Onay Havens5256% gamesnot enough data
Helen Greis + Tara MILBRAND224 matchesnot enough data
Mie Bennett + Tara MILBRAND033 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Lemker + Tara MILBRAND033 matchesnot enough data
Nahomi Kato + Arlene Hasegawa033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mieko Kato
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66
3.5
Lori Lovering
47W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Onay Havens
79W–38L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Tara MILBRAND
24W–18L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Kelly Lemker
85W–67L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.36
Suzanne E Shupe
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Helen Greis
44W–37L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
Mie Bennett
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Christine Bristol
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Kim Fearon
30W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
Rita Murphy
13W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
2.94
3.5
Nahomi Kato
90W–77L career · type A · 9 lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Arlene Hasegawa
23W–62L career · 6 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.