Teams

SSC Risquez

2022 Sarasota Social TriMix Fall · North County

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-12-16vs SSC RossSplit 11
L#2 Mixed DoublesElisabeth Laughlin / Joe Malave vs Nikki Gifford / Thomas Schlender3-6, 4-6
W#3 Mixed DoublesPeter Laughlin / Cyndi Weitzel vs Ken Ross / Lisa Temple6-3, 6-4
2022-11-14vs Laurel Oak CarpenterWon 10
W#3 Mixed DoublesPeter Laughlin / Cyndi Weitzel vs Vivek Kumar / Alicia Cohler6-4, 6-2
2022-10-30Won 10
W#3 Mixed DoublesJoe Malave / Kelley Beall vs Stephen Harvey / Lorraine Harvey6-0, 6-1
2022-10-23vs Payne Park Sunday BrunchLost 01
L#3 Mixed DoublesGustavo Risquez / Cyndi Weitzel vs Nelson Cabrera / Melissa Stanley5-7, 4-6
2022-10-16vs SSC RossLost 01
L#1 Mixed DoublesPeter Laughlin / Elisabeth Laughlin vs Barney Akierman / Elizabeth Park2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for North County have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Haley English
published 4.5
3.78
Gustavo Risquez
published 4
3.72
Peter Laughlin
usually #3 Mixed Doubles 67%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Joe Malave
usually #3 Mixed Doubles 50%, also #2 Mixed Doubles 50% · published 4
3.49
Lori Madden
published 3.5
3.46
Grover Windsor
published 3.5
3.36
Polina Windsor
published
3.28
Becky Atluru
published 3.5
3.20
Trisha Moslin
published
3.15
Brooke Belodoff
published 3.5
3.10
Alina Fotache
published 3.5
2.94
Cyndi Weitzel
usually #3 Mixed Doubles 100% · published 3
Lori Childers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Laughlin + Gustavo Risquez2450% gamesnot enough data
Lori Madden + Polina Windsor123 matchesnot enough data
Gustavo Risquez + Joe Malave123 matchesnot enough data
Cyndi Weitzel + Becky Atluru123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Haley English
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.29
4
Gustavo Risquez
206W–175L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
Peter Laughlin
76W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Joe Malave
127W–103L career · 2 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Lori Madden
74W–53L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Grover Windsor
17W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
Polina Windsor
13W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Becky Atluru
47W–40L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
Trisha Moslin
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Brooke Belodoff
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Alina Fotache
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
3.10
3
Cyndi Weitzel
73W–73L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
2.94
Lori Childers
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.