Teams

CARMEL VAC 18AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Amy Simpson
published 3.5
3.39
Shannon Conner
published
3.39
Diana Wheeler
published 3.5
3.36
Josie Brown
published
Arianne Marsh
published 3.5
Cyd Love
published 3.5
3.25
3.23
Gleidy Wetzel
published 3.5
3.10
Erin Kelly
published 3
3.07
Maureen Webb
published
3.03
Kimberly Nixon
published
2.81
Casey Ford
published 3
2.79
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Lautzenhiser + Diana Wheeler3452% gamesnot enough data
Gleidy Wetzel + Kimberly Nixon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Simpson
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Shannon Conner
15W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Diana Wheeler
22W–34L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.39
Josie Brown
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Arianne Marsh
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Cyd Love
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Jacqueline Lautzenhiser
18W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Gleidy Wetzel
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Erin Kelly
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
Maureen Webb
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Kimberly Nixon
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Casey Ford
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Barbara Ehrenpreis
1W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.