Teams

Jax Golf - Healey

2025 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over

18 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-06vs Duval/Long/40&Over3.0WLost 14
L#1 DoublesMary Ann Healey / Mary Patnaude vs Lindsay Long / Stacey Mayer1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTerri Holmes vs Ana Reyes2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Mendez / Heather Olson vs Lauren Stroker / Susan Reeves6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDianna Menefee / Patricia Engel vs Nancy White / Jennifer Brady1-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesJennifer McGarity / Sylvia Patnaude vs Margaret Blakelock / Susan Conlin0-6, 1-6
2025-03-23vs Duval/Long/40&Over3.0WLost 04
L#1 DoublesAllison Carbonneau / Catherine Evans vs Lindsay Long / Stacey Mayer1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Mendez / Kristin Worley vs Nancy White / Jennifer Brady2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Ann Healey / Jennifer McGarity vs Margaret Blakelock / Beth Jones0-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesMindy Green / Sally Lynch vs Susan Conlin / Caroline Eddings4-6, 4-6
2025-02-25vs Palencia - JimenezLost 05
L#1 DoublesAllison Carbonneau / Kristin Worley vs Michelle Meyer-Devlin / Kathy Evans1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesTerri Holmes vs Iulia Platte2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Mendez / Heather Olson vs Jennifer Jones / Lindy Lollar7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Ann Healey / Jennifer McGarity vs Andi Craig / Laura Jimenez2-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesDianna Menefee / Beckie Fenrick vs Maureen Martyak / Tracy Smith3-6, 2-6
2025-02-09vs The Woods - MedleyLost 23
L#1 DoublesAllison Carbonneau / Catherine Evans vs Rebecca Akridge / Rosy Culpepper3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMary Tice vs Katja Leuthold6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesElissa Orr / Mary Ann Healey vs Jeri Tracy / Rhonda Younger2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSally Lynch / Terri Holmes vs Hannash Avera / Thurley Adolph6-4, 6-3
L#4 DoublesBeckie Fenrick / Dianna Menefee vs Jennifer Medley / Kitty Sheasby1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-01-12vs Duval/McKillop/40&Over3.0WLost 14
W#1 DoublesMary Tice / Catherine Evans vs Kathy DeJesus / Rachel Natoli7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSally Lynch vs Sheila Pensotti7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeather Olson / Kristin Worley vs Kia Linebaugh / Elizabeth McKillop0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Engel / Mary Patnaude vs Nelda Guerra-Smith / Michelle Do Amaral2-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesJennifer McGarity / Beckie Fenrick vs Scottie May / Pamela Brooking4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Mary Tice
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Michelle Mendez
published
2.81
Terri Holmes
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Dianna Menefee
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Beckie Fenrick
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
Deb Prouty
published 3
2.74
Katie Birr
published
2.73
Allison Carbonneau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Sally Lynch
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
2.70
Catherine Evans
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Heather Olson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Mary Patnaude
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.34
Sylvia Patnaude
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Mary Ann Healey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Elissa Orr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer McGarity
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Kristin Worley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Patricia Engel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Evans + Allison Carbonneau1441% games−0.3% vs expected
Catherine Evans + Heather Olson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Tice
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Michelle Mendez
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Terri Holmes
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Dianna Menefee
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Beckie Fenrick
0W–6L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Deb Prouty
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Birr
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
3
Allison Carbonneau
6W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Sally Lynch
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Catherine Evans
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Heather Olson
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%17%83%
2.63
Mary Patnaude
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.47
Sylvia Patnaude
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.34
Mary Ann Healey
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.33
Elissa Orr
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer McGarity
0W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristin Worley
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Engel
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.