Teams

LCTA18/Murphy/MPR

USTA 18 & over Tri-Level · 18 & Over 4.0 3.5 3.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-06vs LCTA18/Anderson-Leahy/I’OnWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Fennell / Melissa Gross vs Pamela Craft / Grace Neal4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCathy Cocolas / Holly Gardner vs Kim ONeill / Wendy Evans6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJanelle Maffucci / Brittany Kalivas vs Krissie Smith / Alicia Fox6-0, 6-1
2025-05-27vs LCTA18/Ryan-Coleman/MaybankWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Fennell / Melissa Gross vs Lizzie Goddard / Elizabeth Stevens1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesVirginie Murphy / Sarah Rosenthal vs Allison Ryan / Lauren Crary6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlex Austin / Brittany Kalivas vs Tracey Zirneklis / Bethany Britton6-3, 6-1
2025-05-16vs LCTA18/Biggs/MPRDWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelissa Gross / Stefanie Seixas-Mikelus vs Jenny Biggs / Lori Cameron7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Rosenthal / Cee Cee Young vs Leighton Winship / Lynda Hamilton3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle MacKes / Becky Smith vs Kim Fasanaro / Carly Hara6-7, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 4.0 3.5 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Carolyn Fennell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Melissa Gross
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Stefanie Seixas-Mikelus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Lara Hobby
published
3.49
Holly Gardner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Sarah Rosenthal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Tatsiana Beiko
published
3.35
Janelle Maffucci
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Brittany Kalivas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Cathy Cocolas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Alex Austin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Cee Cee Young
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Michelle MacKes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Virginie Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Jennifer Hale
published
2.83
Katie Catalana
published
Heidi Richter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cee Cee Young + Sarah Rosenthal6155% games+7.5% vs expected
Cathy Cocolas + Sarah Rosenthal7257% games+3.7% vs expected
Brittany Kalivas + Alex Austin5160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carolyn Fennell
30W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Melissa Gross
42W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Stefanie Seixas-Mikelus
44W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
Lara Hobby
29W–31L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Holly Gardner
65W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
Sarah Rosenthal
60W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Tatsiana Beiko
28W–92L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.37
Janelle Maffucci
59W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Brittany Kalivas
31W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Cathy Cocolas
40W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Alex Austin
48W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Cee Cee Young
46W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.10
Michelle MacKes
86W–45L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Virginie Murphy
78W–76L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Jennifer Hale
45W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
2.89
Katie Catalana
47W–24L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Heidi Richter
20W–27L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.