Teams

CC Soto Nash

2026 USTA CC Spring Adult 18 & OVER · CC USTA 3.5M 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-28vs CC SLOCC 3.5MWon 10
W#1 DoublesEdgar Alvarez / Matthew Sapien vs Samer Othman / Robert Johnson6-2, 6-3
2026-06-14vs CC - LLW - SMCC CabilesLost 03
L#1 DoublesOliver Peregrin / Matthew Sapien vs Gabriel Alcantara / Matthew Hiltner0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBen Coleman vs Brandon Sedgwick0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEdgar Alvarez / Matthew Nash vs Phong Thach / Nathan Nunez3-6, 6-7
2026-06-07vs CC - LLW - SMCC CabilesWon 20
W#1 DoublesEdgar Alvarez / Matthew Sapien vs Jevon Meals / Emmanuel Orozco6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesOliver Peregrin vs Won Moon6-2, 7-6
2026-05-29vs CC SLOCC 3.5MLost 12
L#1 DoublesMatthew Sapien / Hans Kim vs Robert Johnson / Scott Thorshov3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesOliver Peregrin vs Erik Ramberg6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGreg Porter / Thomas Cooper Bell vs Michael Leeder / Justin Wellner1-6, 4-6
2026-05-17vs CC - LLW - SMCC CabilesLost 03
L#1 DoublesEdgar Alvarez / Matthew Nash vs Steve Gordon / Brandon Sedgwick4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBen Coleman vs Derek Glas0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Sapien / Oliver Peregrin vs Phong Thach / Steven Baird4-6, 1-6
2026-05-08vs CC SLOCC 3.5MLost 12
W#1 DoublesEdgar Alvarez / Matthew Nash vs Michael Leeder / Scott Thorshov6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesShad Anderson vs John Strong4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHans Kim / Will Rinehart vs Jonathan Fu / Robert Johnson1-6, 4-6
2026-05-03vs CC - LLW - SMCC CabilesLost 03
L#1 DoublesEdgar Alvarez / Oliver Peregrin vs Matthew Hiltner / Gabriel Alcantara1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBen Coleman vs Won Moon1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Cooper Bell / Greg Porter vs Phong Thach / Steven Baird1-6, 1-6
2026-04-26vs CC SLOCC 3.5MWon 30
W#1 DoublesShad Anderson / Hans Kim vs Michael Reburn / Samer Othman7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDaniel Ha vs Jonathan Fu6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEdgar Alvarez / Oliver Peregrin vs Erik Ramberg / Sean Newsom6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · CC USTA 3.5M 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CC - LLW - SMCC Cabiles7121310130
2CC Soto Nash3591531223
3CC SLOCC 3.5M2661837267

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Dagne Ricci
published 4.5
3.30
Edgar Alvarez
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.25
Matthew Sapien
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Daniel Ha
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Oliver Peregrin
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.96
Greg Porter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Ben Coleman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.78
Hans Kim
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Shad Anderson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Thomas Cooper Bell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Will Rinehart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dagne Ricci
7W–1L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
4.13
3.5
Edgar Alvarez
4W–3L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Matthew Sapien
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Daniel Ha
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Oliver Peregrin
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Greg Porter
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96
3.5
Ben Coleman
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.94
3
Hans Kim
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78
Shad Anderson
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Thomas Cooper Bell
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Will Rinehart
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.