Teams

CCM - Arata

2025 Combo 40 & Over Women Day - Mobile · 6.5 Women Day 40

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-22vs MO 6.5W 40 & Over (Crowley/Bailey)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Jean Tulowitzki / Lari Arras vs Aimee Crowley / Shelley Piazza0-2
W#2 DoublesKati Arata / Lee Marriott vs Semra Nieves / Rachel M Bailey6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCurry Stahl / Mindi Welford vs Ashley Hagan / Shannon Spinks2-6, 1-6
2025-06-10vs Oakwood - NonnenmacherWon 30
W#1 DoublesApril Boudreaux / Amanda Jean Tulowitzki vs Reenie Kinney / Lisa Warren6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLeslie Baker / Lee Marriott vs Kathy Clark / Theresa Perry6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNicky Cox / Kati Arata vs Sheila Mahoney / Susan Nonnenmacher6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women Day 40 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Maureen LaCour
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.46
Nicky Cox
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Lee Marriott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Mindi Welford
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
April Boudreaux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Jill Bedsole
published
3.14
Kim Meador
published
3.13
Kelly Picard
published
2.95
Lari Arras
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Amanda Jean Tulowitzki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Kati Arata
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.71
Curry Stahl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lee Marriott + Kati Arata8846% games+2.0% vs expected
Kim Meador + Maureen LaCour161154% games+1.5% vs expected
Lari Arras + Amanda Jean Tulowitzki7365% games+1.3% vs expected
Lee Marriott + Kelly Picard4250% games−1.9% vs expected
Amanda Jean Tulowitzki + April Boudreaux2455% gamesnot enough data
Nicky Cox + Kati Arata224 matchesnot enough data
Nicky Cox + Kelly Picard314 matchesnot enough data
April Boudreaux + Kelly Picard224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maureen LaCour
78W–49L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Nicky Cox
39W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
Lee Marriott
42W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Mindi Welford
31W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
April Boudreaux
19W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Jill Bedsole
42W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.15
Kim Meador
22W–31L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.14
Kelly Picard
15W–27L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.13
Lari Arras
36W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Amanda Jean Tulowitzki
65W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
Kati Arata
25W–64L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Curry Stahl
16W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.