Teams

DPTG TFT/Paladugu/Dublin

2026 Tri-Level 3.0 · 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-21vs Thunderbolts/Kudupu/FremontLost 12
W#1 DoublesPraveenkumar Davidson / Saptarshi Roy vs Balachandra Rangaswamy / William Du6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesVicente Belizario / Santhosh Kumar Kuchoor vs Aveer Thakur / Avinash Viswanathan4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesGurmeet Singh / Srini Parimi vs Amit Agarwal / Manoj Selukar3-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesNikhil Prakash / Saptarshi Roy vs Geoff Kennedy / Robert Greer3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNarayana Rao Surapaneni / Vicente Belizario vs Rob Thomas / Dimitry Goldshteyn4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesChagari Vamsi Reddy / Sambit Khandai vs William Facteau / Fadhly Bey7-5, 6-4
2026-03-20vs Aces Wild/Alves/San JoseWon 30
W#1 DoublesSuresh Nagavarapu / Saptarshi Roy vs Mark Alves / Ross Williams6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNischit Omkar / Ravi Kiran Reddy Madireddy vs Peng Xi / Jeff Chang3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChagari Vamsi Reddy / Jagadeesh Nelaparthi vs Tim D Nguyen / Manoj Kandlikar6-2, 6-3
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Cannon / Praveenkumar Davidson vs Daniel Dang / Jeffrey Tsaw3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChinmaya Sahoo / Ravi Kiran Reddy Madireddy vs Michael Wong / Seiji Bellavigna4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGurmeet Singh / Srini Parimi vs Edwin Palang / Enrico Alis6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DPTG/Mangonon/Pleasanton40120182
2Slicebro/Sun/Sunnyvale4093995
3Warriors/Venkitakrishnan/San Ramon408412106
4Thunderbolts/Kudupu/Fremont318410104
5DPTG TFT/Paladugu/Dublin318411111
6Dream Team/Wei/Saratoga317512105
7RoyalFlush/Tjoa/Dublin225715117
8Wukong/He/Palo Alto136615124
9Blackhawk Tennis Villains/Dacayanan/Danville135716125
10DVTC/Dasgupta/Danville135718134
11Mishits/Lewis/Burlingame134818129
12Aces Wild/Alves/San Jose133918119
13Silent Assassins/Santos/San Francisco134819133
14Framers/Hennessy/Walnut Creek134820134
15Pain in the Ace/Austero/Oakley0421021135

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
3.63
Ravi Kiran Reddy Madireddy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Praveenkumar Davidson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Jeffrey Cannon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Saptarshi Roy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Srinivas Javvadi
published
3.38
Chinmaya Sahoo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Nikhil Prakash
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Santhosh Kumar Kuchoor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Vicente Belizario
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Nischit Omkar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Gurmeet Singh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
3.13
3.06
Srini Parimi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Jagadeesh Nelaparthi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Chagari Vamsi Reddy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Sambit Khandai
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ravi Kiran Reddy Madireddy + Nischit Omkar404 matchesnot enough data
Vicente Belizario + Narayana Rao Surapaneni033 matchesnot enough data
Vicente Belizario + Srinivas Javvadi303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Suresh Nagavarapu
57W–22L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Ravi Kiran Reddy Madireddy
24W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.63
Praveenkumar Davidson
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
Jeffrey Cannon
19W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
Saptarshi Roy
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Srinivas Javvadi
8W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.38
3.5
Chinmaya Sahoo
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Nikhil Prakash
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
Santhosh Kumar Kuchoor
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
1%84%15%
3.35
Vicente Belizario
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.35
Nischit Omkar
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Gurmeet Singh
13W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.14
3.5
Narayana Rao Surapaneni
87W–76L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Vamsikrishna Paladugu
1W–9L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Srini Parimi
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
Jagadeesh Nelaparthi
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Chagari Vamsi Reddy
6W–2L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
2.88
Sambit Khandai
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%14%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.