Teams

SFV - Mixed Up

2022 Mixed 18 & Over - SFV · SFV 18 & Over - 7.0 MxD

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-20vs SFV - PVCC-Diverse Too!Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAldo Angrisani / Rachel Fischell vs Ken Green / Michele Venegas4-3
2022-02-26vs SFV - Warner SlammersLost 01
L#3 DoublesMARCELITO CASTRO / Caprina Auyong vs Justin Schofield / Olga Marina0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMara Zeldin / Aldo Angrisani vs Sylvia Yaafe / Jose MacKinney1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCarrie Gasper / Bruce Lilly vs Summer Williamson / Melvin Navarro6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2022-02-05vs SFV - Mixed NutsLost 01
L#1 DoublesAldo Angrisani / Patricia Francisco vs Deepak Antony / Melissa Fonteboa3-6, 1-6
2022-01-29Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJohn Tkach / Carrie Gasper vs John Rubeli / Sharon Aguila3-6, 2-6
2022-01-09vs SFV - Pure DriveLost 01
L#3 DoublesCaprina Auyong / John Tkach vs Frank Abt / Diana Amado2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - 7.0 MxD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Aldo Angrisani
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Paula Marbach
published
3.27
Glen Chester
published 3.5
3.26
Kathleen Foy-Asaro
published 3.5
3.22
Bruce Lilly
published 3.5
3.19
Mark Gasper
published
3.16
Carrie Gasper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Caprina Auyong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.82
Jeffrey Korerat
published
2.66
Molly Jackson
published
2.60
Pamela Bentley
published
2.50
Patricia Francisco
published
John Tkach
published
Julie Sato
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aldo Angrisani + Julie Sato123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Aldo Angrisani
93W–87L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Paula Marbach
18W–24L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Glen Chester
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Kathleen Foy-Asaro
172W–163L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Bruce Lilly
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Mark Gasper
4W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%7%93%
3.19
3.5
Carrie Gasper
189W–211L career · 2 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Caprina Auyong
86W–81L career · 2 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
Jeffrey Korerat
16W–14L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
Molly Jackson
14W–16L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
Pamela Bentley
9W–7L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
2.60
Patricia Francisco
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50
John Tkach
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Sato
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.