Teams

Dempsey - Hits and Giggles 4.0

2026 Baltimore Singles · Baltimore Singles 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-23vs Lewis - Don's Angels 4.0WLost 12
W#1 SinglesKate Dempsey vs Alexis Ospelt6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAudrey Liu vs Amy Markwort0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesSandra Kick vs Kiley Murphy3-6, 2-6
2026-08-18vs Lewis - Don's Angels 4.0WLost 12
W#1 SinglesSara Orthwein vs Alexis Ospelt6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJill Rose vs Kiley Murphy5-2
L#3 SinglesKate Dempsey vs Maneesha Ahluwalia6-7, 4-5
2026-08-15vs Lewis - Don's Angels 4.0WWon 21
W#1 SinglesKatie Tetrault vs Maneesha Ahluwalia6-3, 6-0
L#2 SinglesSandra Kick vs Ashley Moody4-6, 4-5
W#3 SinglesJill Rose vs Zaineb Makhzoumi6-2, 6-2
2026-08-12vs Lewis - Don's Angels 4.0WSplit 11
L#2 SinglesBeyza Akcam vs Virginia Fung1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAudrey Liu vs Ashley Moody6-4, 5-2
2026-08-09vs Lewis - Don's Angels 4.0WLost 03
L#1 SinglesSandra Kick vs Amy Markwort3-6, 5-6
L#2 SinglesAudrey Liu vs Alexis Ospelt3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesKate Dempsey vs Zaineb Makhzoumi1-6, 1-6
2026-08-04vs Lewis - Don's Angels 4.0WSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSara Orthwein vs Kiley Murphy7-5, 6-7
L#3 SinglesBeyza Akcam vs Maneesha Ahluwalia4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Singles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Sara Orthwein
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.94
Jill Rose
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.78
Katie Tetrault
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.71
Audrey Liu
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.68
Kate Dempsey
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.67
Sandra Kick
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.42
Beyza Akcam
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Rose + Katie Tetrault4164% games+5.2% vs expected
Audrey Liu + Sandra Kick044 matchesnot enough data
Beyza Akcam + Sandra Kick213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Orthwein
19W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
Jill Rose
46W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Katie Tetrault
144W–97L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Audrey Liu
10W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Kate Dempsey
29W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Sandra Kick
97W–89L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Beyza Akcam
211W–249L career · 2 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
3.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.