← Teams

THPRD-Bailey/Funkhouser

2022 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.29 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Clay Funkhouser
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Cheryl Roloff
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Susie Garland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Kerry Sanford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Michael Rich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Jim Mounts
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.51
George Scott
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Abbas Mottaghi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 0
—
Jerry Garland
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 0
—
Steve Sanford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 0
Results8 ties
2022-05-21Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesKerry Sanford / Steve Sanford vs Haydee Vila / John McLain6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBonnie Bailey / Michael Rich vs Stacy Naccachian / Tony Moreno6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSandra Ellis / Abbas Mottaghi vs Liz DelPlato / KRIKOR NACCACHIAN6-3, 6-3
2022-05-15Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesAbbas Mottaghi / Sandra Ellis vs Dick Kennish / Donna Kennish6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJim Mounts / Susie Garland vs Michael Jansen / Catherine Greenblatt6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJerry Garland / Cheryl Roloff vs Kirk Planck / Erin Doucet6-1, 6-3
2022-05-14Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesCheryl Roloff / George Scott vs Kim Hamlik / Jim Hamlik6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBonnie Bailey / Jim Mounts vs Denise Dawkins / Andy LaFrazia6-0, 6-1
2022-05-07Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesSteve Sanford / Kerry Sanford vs Les Wellman / Mary Beth Thomsen6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJerry Garland / Cheryl Roloff vs Steven Garlock / Paula Watt7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesClay Funkhouser / Jan Funkhouser vs Bert Berends / Kathleen Francis6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2022-04-30Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesSandra Ellis / Clay Funkhouser vs Nancy Osborne / Jeff Anhaltzer6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSharon Reese / Abbas Mottaghi vs Lori Zoborowski / Rand Zoborowski4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathy Briscoe / George Scott vs Rita DeWeese / Jim DeWeese1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-22Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesSandra Ellis / Clay Funkhouser vs Matthew Trank / Jennifer Trank4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusie Garland / Michael Rich vs Lillian Lee / Bill Rhoades7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKathy Briscoe / George Scott vs Rhonda Baker / Mike Baker6-4, 6-3
2022-04-10Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKerry Sanford / Steve Sanford vs Dalika Crawford / Kip Stevenson6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSusie Garland / Michael Rich vs Nicolle Lochner / Glenn Eisen6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBonnie Bailey / Jim Mounts vs Christian Buchholz / Alan Peters7-5, 6-0
2022-04-02Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesSteve Sanford / Kathy Briscoe vs Bruce Trubo / Betty Trubo6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJerry Garland / Cheryl Roloff vs Dan Wendling / Bernadette Widolff7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSharon Reese / Abbas Mottaghi vs Jim George / Kathleen Francis1-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Clay Funkhouser
37W–53L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Cheryl Roloff
42W–107L career
1%99%0%
3.25
3.5
Susie Garland
37W–56L career
25%75%0%
3.06
3.5
Kerry Sanford
22W–32L career · type A
40%60%0%
3.00
3
Michael Rich
45W–77L career
0%95%5%
2.90
3
Jim Mounts
59W–65L career
0%96%4%
2.87
3
George Scott
26W–78L career
35%65%0%
2.51
0
Abbas Mottaghi
8W–14L career
not enough data
—
0
Jerry Garland
5W–18L career
not enough data
—
0
Steve Sanford
31W–35L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.