Teams

His Fault

2022 USTA ADULT 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-13vs Good Vibrations!Won 20
W#1 DoublesChad Longson / Michael Shipp vs Scott Crane / Bill Nelson6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPat Raymes / Tad Cowley vs Scott Carlisle / Aaron Wolter7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2022-05-12vs Fuzzy Yellow BallsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTroy Casper / Tad Cowley vs Randy Dewey / Todd Clark4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChad Longson / Michael Shipp vs Kevin Hartsig / Brian Griebe6-1, 6-2
2022-05-10vs Good Vibrations!Lost 02
L#2 DoublesTad Cowley / Lee Parsons vs Scott Crane / Don Young2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChad Longson / Matt Moore vs Scott Carlisle / Tom Young2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-05-05vs Cryan BrothersWon 10
W#2 DoublesTad Cowley / Owen Hammond vs Anthony Olbrich / Chris Angermayer6-2, 6-2
2022-04-29vs Fuzzy Yellow BallsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTroy Casper / Tad Cowley vs Orlando Ciniglio / Brian Griebe7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesOwen Hammond / Chad Longson vs Todd Clark / Bruce Clark6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2022-04-26Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTad Cowley / Chad Longson vs Nick Koontz / Frederick Noble7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesChad Longson / Ryan van Alfen vs Nick Koontz / Frederick Noble6-4, 7-6
2022-04-05vs Fuzzy Yellow BallsLost 03
L#1 DoublesRyan van Alfen / Michael Shipp vs Corey Copeland / Tom Michael4-6, 5-6
L#2 DoublesChad Longson / Owen Hammond vs Randy Dewey / Todd Clark1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTad Cowley / Matt Moore vs Dennis Suihkonen / Orlando Ciniglio1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1His Fault63231332271
2Good Vibrations!54181841327
3Fuzzy Yellow Balls45191738320
4Cryan Brothers36122452366

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Troy Casper
published 3.5
3.24
Lee Parsons
published 3
3.21
William Merrick
published 3.5
Chad Longson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.62
Owen Hammond
published 3
Adam Shipp
published
Bret Linton
published
Michael Shipp
published
Pat Raymes
published
Ryan van Alfen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tad Cowley
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Merrick + Owen Hammond10264% games+9.4% vs expected
Owen Hammond + Chad Longson4255% gamesnot enough data
Lee Parsons + Owen Hammond314 matchesnot enough data
Lee Parsons + Tad Cowley044 matchesnot enough data
Tad Cowley + Troy Casper044 matchesnot enough data
Ryan van Alfen + Chad Longson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Troy Casper
131W–81L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.49
3
Lee Parsons
64W–75L career · no lines in 2022
<1%3%97%
3.24
3.5
William Merrick
83W–58L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3
Chad Longson
9W–3L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Owen Hammond
37W–56L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
2.62
Adam Shipp
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Bret Linton
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Shipp
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pat Raymes
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ryan van Alfen
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tad Cowley
34W–52L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.