Teams

MLong55-DUR

2025 Eno River Combo 55 & Over · 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day

10 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-02vs JPermutt-CHTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesDiane Allen / Caroline Patzer vs Cindy Sapienza / Joelle Permutt1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKristine Potter / Lorrie Hareza vs Tracy Kinsey / Anne Wander6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRichelle Robinson / Terry Friddle vs Carol Davis / Mary Griffiths6-0, 6-1
2025-09-25vs JHagerty-YMCASplit 11
L#1 DoublesCaroline Patzer / Stacy Brehm vs Claire Blackwelder / Donna Newell4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMary T Long / Virgina Wilson vs Karen Maus / Sharon Paye6-1, 6-2
2025-09-18vs DWebb-DURSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCaroline Patzer / Diane Allen vs Donna Holtaway / Camille Blommer6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMary T Long / Stacy Brehm vs Susan Alden / Karen Foster0-6, 2-6
2025-09-18vs JSykes-CCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesCaroline Patzer / Diane Allen vs Beth Clark / Terry Summers6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesVirgina Wilson / Mary T Long vs Gay Engelbrecht / Patricia Carroll6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesElaine Bardes / Terry Friddle vs Barbara St Clair / Debra Stonehouse3-6, 6-7
2025-09-11vs DHostetler-HRWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiane Allen / Caroline Patzer vs Candace Carraway / June Mader6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristine Potter / Virgina Wilson vs Kathleen Fitts / Doreen Hostetler6-3, 6-0
2025-08-28vs LFarber-CHTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesElaine Bardes / Lorrie Hareza vs Araya Coffey / Melissa Fitzpatrick0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMary T Long / Caroline Patzer vs Yvonne Acker / Tara ODonnel6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesStacy Brehm / Kristin Karas vs Sarah Ederle / Cheryl Stevens1-6, 0-6
2025-08-21vs KHoekstra-HRSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLorrie Hareza / Kristine Potter vs Doreen Sanfelici / Nancy Riefkohl1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRichelle Robinson / Terry Friddle vs Laurie Millar / Kateri Hoekstra6-4, 7-6
2025-08-14vs JTillman-CHCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesLorrie Hareza / Kristin Karas vs Marybeth Evers / Sarah Sapeta1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Patzer / Stacy Brehm vs Monica Jenkins / Cynthia Cross4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesVirgina Wilson / Diane Allen vs Allison Worthy / Lee Wollman6-4, 6-2
2025-08-13vs RGeorgi-HRWon 30
W#1 DoublesCaroline Patzer / Stacy Brehm vs Pamela Cherry / Cheryl Bock6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Allen / Kristine Potter vs Mary Panek / Joelle Romac6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElaine Bardes / Richelle Robinson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Caroline Patzer
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
3.34
Kristine Potter
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Lorrie Hareza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Virgina Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.98
Elaine Bardes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Stacy Brehm
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.82
Mary T Long
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.71
Richelle Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Terry Friddle
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Kristin Karas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Virgina Wilson + Mary T Long5253% games+12.0% vs expected
Caroline Patzer + Stacy Brehm61842% games+1.3% vs expected
Stacy Brehm + Terry Friddle8850% games−1.8% vs expected
Richelle Robinson + Terry Friddle7268% gamesnot enough data
Virgina Wilson + Kristine Potter4355% gamesnot enough data
Stacy Brehm + Mary T Long134 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Patzer + Mary T Long303 matchesnot enough data
Mary T Long + Kristine Potter123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Patzer
142W–90L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Kristine Potter
146W–70L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
Lorrie Hareza
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.19
3
Virgina Wilson
50W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.15
3
Elaine Bardes
22W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Stacy Brehm
92W–161L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Mary T Long
48W–104L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Richelle Robinson
125W–138L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Terry Friddle
164W–164L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.71
Kristin Karas
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.