Teams

BRMST GREEN

2025 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.19 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-11vs LTA-Q PURPLELost 03
L#1 DoublesCarol Anderson / Denise Boselli vs Julie Stockert / Charlotte Marsh4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Gallo / Margaret Bender vs Susan Rasmussen / Jackye Whalen2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCynthia Manley / Ann Ipsen vs Susan Keenan / Mia Morrison4-6, 4-6
2025-06-04vs NJ YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesVickie Garn / Cynthia Burchell vs Rebecca Strobel / Susan Lenny3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDenise Boselli / Karen Gallo vs Julie Lochner / Mary Bare3-6, 2-6
2025-05-28vs NJ TEALLost 03
L#1 DoublesSandy Sutton / Denise Boselli vs Patti Poole / Lisa Kellogg0-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Burchell / Cheryl Williams vs Marlene Swartz / Pamela Johnstone0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Gallo / Vickie Garn vs Christy Carello / Terri Jenney3-6, 2-6
2025-05-21vs MEA TEALLost 12
W#1 DoublesCheryl Williams / Kari Diamond vs Teri Jean Fry / Sue Mills6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAnn Ipsen / Denise Boselli vs Shawna Sharp / Brenda Ellis5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Anderson / Cynthia Manley vs Molly Kirk / Megan Murray2-6, 4-6
2025-05-14vs TTA TEALWon 21
W#1 DoublesSandy Sutton / Kari Diamond vs Jennifer Arbuckle / Alecia Phillips7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnn Ipsen / Vickie Garn vs Diana Merritt / Catherine Anderson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Anderson / Cynthia Manley vs Sandy Wheaton / Janice Cook6-1, 6-4
2025-05-07vs RCC GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnn Ipsen / Denise Boselli vs Janice Bailey / Cindy Ronlov3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesVickie Garn / Cheryl Williams vs Diane Misgen / Lisa Highley2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Bender / Cynthia Burchell vs Patricia Sato / Jill Nelson5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-04-30vs CVTA YELLOWWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnn Ipsen / Sandy Sutton vs Sally Vander Veer / Susan Hoy6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarol Anderson / Denise Boselli vs Marion Fisher / Carmen Gunn4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCynthia Manley / Margaret Bender vs Alisa Mallinger / Amanda Kapolnek6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Cheryl Williams
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Kari Diamond
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Margaret Bender
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Carol Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Ann Ipsen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.78
Cynthia Manley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Vickie Garn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Denise Boselli
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Karen Gallo
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.67
Cynthia Burchell
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jill Bouck
published
Sandy Sutton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Williams + Vickie Garn3549% gamesnot enough data
Cynthia Manley + Vickie Garn2444% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Williams + Margaret Bender134 matchesnot enough data
Carol Anderson + Ann Ipsen123 matchesnot enough data
Carol Anderson + Cheryl Williams213 matchesnot enough data
Carol Anderson + Margaret Bender213 matchesnot enough data
Kari Diamond + Cheryl Williams213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cheryl Williams
145W–113L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
Kari Diamond
19W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Margaret Bender
10W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Carol Anderson
23W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Ann Ipsen
6W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
3
Cynthia Manley
64W–73L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Vickie Garn
98W–90L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Denise Boselli
14W–41L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Karen Gallo
199W–136L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
3
Cynthia Burchell
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
2.67
Jill Bouck
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Sutton
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.