Teams

Farmington-Worth

2024 Charlottesville Combo · Charlottesville Combo 5.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-29vs ACAC-BarrettWon 20
W#1 DoublesLoring Woodriff / Scout Crimmins vs Stephanie Lewandowski / Samantha Bates6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnn Hay Hardy / Olivia Wages vs Jessica Lukens / Lauren Thraves6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-10-17vs Forest Lakes-SanfordWon 20
W#1 DoublesLoring Woodriff / Scout Crimmins vs Kelly Guyton / Shauna Hogg6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJenn Crutchfield Worth / Shannon Mrazik vs Marion Hight / Laura Wall6-4, 7-6
2024-10-16vs ACAC-BarrettWon 30
W#1 DoublesLoring Woodriff / Shannon Mrazik vs Karin Jones / Samantha Bates6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnn Hay Hardy / Olivia Wages vs Lauren Thraves / Ann Hague6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJenn Crutchfield Worth / Gina Senese vs Saundra Barrett / Tamara Murray6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-10-15vs BHSC-JohnsonWon 30
W#1 DoublesShannon Mrazik / Loring Woodriff vs Susan Park / Megan Greenwood6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJenn Crutchfield Worth / Olivia Wages vs Lauren Dunn / Anne Curran Small6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCourtney Sievers / Ann Hay Hardy vs Bethany Johnson / Laura Hilliard7-6, 7-5
2024-10-10vs Glenmore/Keswick-RouzerWon 20
W#1 DoublesLoring Woodriff / Shannon Mrazik vs Nerissa Rouzer / Pam Socolow6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJenn Crutchfield Worth / Olivia Wages vs Kathleen Edwards / Diane Espinosa6-1, 6-2
2024-10-04vs Forest Lakes-SanfordWon 20
W#1 DoublesJenn Crutchfield Worth / Shannon Mrazik vs Christine Eagleson / Beth Kohler6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJeanette Wang / Loring Woodriff vs Michelle Katstra / Marion Hight7-5, 7-6
2024-09-19vs BHSC-JohnsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLoring Woodriff / Gina Senese vs Susie Jones / Kathryn Harris6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnn Hay Hardy / Jennifer Keevil vs Alice Raucher / Abigail Cook Dommer3-6, 4-6
2024-09-12vs Glenmore/Keswick-RouzerWon 10
W#1 DoublesScout Crimmins / Loring Woodriff vs Amelia Black / Andrea Wilder6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Combo 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Scout Crimmins
published
2.92
Loring Woodriff
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.87
Jenn Crutchfield Worth
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Celia Aidinoff
published 3
2.73
Ann Hay Hardy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Katie Cowen
published
2.56
2.56
Shannon Mrazik
published
2.44
Courtney Sievers
published 3
2.32
Sherry Nedzbala
published
2.25
Jeanette Wang
published
1.95
Jennifer Keevil
published
Mary Knerr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Hay Hardy + Loring Woodriff8654% gamesnot enough data
Ann Hay Hardy + Jenn Crutchfield Worth8258% gamesnot enough data
Loring Woodriff + Jenn Crutchfield Worth314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scout Crimmins
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
2.93
3
Loring Woodriff
71W–61L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Jenn Crutchfield Worth
47W–21L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Celia Aidinoff
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Ann Hay Hardy
64W–53L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
Katie Cowen
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Caroline Childers
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.56
Shannon Mrazik
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Courtney Sievers
6W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.44
Sherry Nedzbala
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
2.32
Jeanette Wang
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.25
Jennifer Keevil
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Mary Knerr
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.