Teams

Missouri City - All Frame

Tri Level · Men 3.0, 3.5, 4.0

12 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-17vs Katy Park - DragonsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJabez Kim / Phillips Truong vs Lening Wang / Chaoning Zeng4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWarren Diec / Eryl Ragasa vs Yilin Mao / Wade Ma6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHarrison Wang / Harrison Li vs Hongzhi Jin / Yao Duan1-6, 4-6
2026-08-10vs LLTC - ZealotsLost 12
L#1 DoublesPho Nguyen / Phillips Truong vs Nicolas Galleguillos / Richard Sexton2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesVincent Tran / Matthew Watts vs Tyler Osterhaus / Eric Storey6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTony Mai / Kevin Guan vs Bruce Mills / CHARLES HILDEBRAND3-6, 2-6
2026-08-04vs MPTC - Kings of the CourtWon 21
W#1 DoublesJabez Kim / Phillips Truong vs Scott Laraway / Bosco Urcuyo6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesWarren Diec / Eryl Ragasa vs Leon Romero / Mark Powers7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHarrison Li / Tony Mai vs Huan Zhao / Stephen Milton6-2, 6-3
2026-07-27vs LLTC - Ace AvengersWon 30
W#1 DoublesTuyen Nguyen / Jabez Kim vs John Lu / Thomas MNguyen6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWarren Diec / Eryl Ragasa vs Tai Nguyen / Doug Whitehead3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHarrison Li / Tony Mai vs Xiaoqin Huang / David Green7-6, 6-3
2026-07-20vs LLTC - Ace N SpinnersSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEryl Ragasa / Matthew Watts vs Patrick LaFleur / Doug Yarger6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesStern Yeh / Tuyen Nguyen vs Hugo Gerardo Palencia Ferrer / Bethuel Gabriel1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men 3.0, 3.5, 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Missouri City - All Frame4110513119
2Katy Park - Dragons227513106
3LLTC - Ace Avengers02151069

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Matthew Watts
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.58
Tuyen Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Jabez Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Stern Yeh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Pho Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Warren Diec
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.21
Phillips Truong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Eryl Ragasa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Harrison Li
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Tony Mai
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Harrison Wang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Kevin Guan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pho Nguyen + Stern Yeh123 matchesnot enough data
Warren Diec + Eryl Ragasa213 matchesnot enough data
Warren Diec + Matthew Watts213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Watts
53W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.78
Tuyen Nguyen
33W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.58
Jabez Kim
8W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.47
Stern Yeh
40W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
Pho Nguyen
33W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
Warren Diec
33W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.26
Phillips Truong
8W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.21
Eryl Ragasa
15W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
Harrison Li
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Tony Mai
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Harrison Wang
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Kevin Guan
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.