Teams

SDNC 9.0 San Dieguito/ Gamboa-Wood

2025 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over Winter- SDNC · SDNC

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesEric Jew / Allison Sterett vs Christopher Lopez-Simons / Barbara Mooney1-6, 4-6
2025-03-15vs SD 9.0 Pacific Beach TC/ ParkLost 01
L#1 DoublesTiffany Kellogg / Jonathan Coyle vs Hillary Park / Jose Zaragoza7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-02-22vs SD 9.0 Peninsula TC/ HagopianLost 02
L#1 DoublesRichette Lock / Adam Espiritu vs Maegen Demko / David Bracher4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNathan Heussenstamm / Jenny Sharratt vs Luke Chang / Wileen Chiu4-6, 2-6
2025-02-15vs SD LLW 9.0 Balboa TC/ MartinezLost 01
L#2 DoublesTiffany Kellogg / Eric Jew vs Ana Seelinger / Stuart Ridge2-6, 3-6
2025-02-01vs SDNC 9.0 Rancho Valencia/ AndrusLost 12
L#1 DoublesTiffany Kellogg / Andrew Buckner vs Thomas McCarthy / Kimberly McCarthy7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDiane Ghiron / John Flowers vs Robin Hubbard / Temo Helenes2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Sterett / Jonathan Coyle vs Cara Puscasiu / Bryan Andrus6-4, 6-2
2025-01-18vs SDNC 9.0 RPTC/ ArenasLost 02
L#1 DoublesEric Jew / Diane Ghiron vs Jesse Donahue / Bettina Olah2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAdam Espiritu / Jenny Sharratt vs Billy Arenas / Olivia Speir5-7, 4-6
2025-01-11vs SDNC 9.0 Carmel Valley/ KubaLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichette Lock / Adam Espiritu vs Valerie Tan / Daniel Lee2-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.93
Sanem Ahearn
published
4.42
Allison Sterett
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.38
Tiffany Kellogg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.35
Mary Malhame
published 4.5
4.30
Jenny Sharratt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.09
Richette Lock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Diane Ghiron
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.05
Celia Gamboa-Wood
published 4.5
Jonathan Coyle
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sanem Ahearn
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.93
4.5
Allison Sterett
123W–62L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Tiffany Kellogg
163W–91L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
4.38
4.5
Mary Malhame
48W–22L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
4.35
4.5
Jenny Sharratt
93W–60L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Richette Lock
96W–83L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.09
4.5
Diane Ghiron
100W–80L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Celia Gamboa-Wood
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
Jonathan Coyle
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.