Teams

RN-STANLEY

2023 MATA Tri-Level 18 & Over - Spring · 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.70 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Hannah Grossman
published
4.29
Dannita Stanley
published 4.5
4.07
Ellen Thomas
published
Amanda Morris
published 4
3.67
Joanna Roller
published
3.33
Teresa Moody
published
3.32
Julie Redick
published
3.18
Alana Alvarez
published 3.5
3.16
Christine Helms
published 3.5
3.08
Kim Carter
published
2.87
Ibelise Castro
published
2.66
Heather DeRojas
published
2.55
Barbara Flanagan
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanna Roller + Julie Redick224 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Moody + Joanna Roller303 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Moody + Kim Carter033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hannah Grossman
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
4.39
4.5
Dannita Stanley
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.29
Ellen Thomas
29W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
4.07
4
Amanda Morris
no matches on record · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joanna Roller
17W–32L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
Teresa Moody
18W–40L career · no lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
3.33
Julie Redick
13W–26L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Alana Alvarez
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Christine Helms
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
Kim Carter
20W–32L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
Ibelise Castro
13W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.87
Heather DeRojas
13W–21L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Barbara Flanagan
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.