Teams

LI:Carefree, Bacey/Bonadonna

2025 Tri Level Women 5.0 · 5.0,4.5,4.0

20 players · average NTRP 4.33 / LONG ISLAND REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-18vs StarckeWon 20
W#2 DoublesSondra Glueck / Kristen Cassidy vs Diann Starcke / Gina Hagedorn7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlyssa Bonadonna / Beth Mercante vs Misha Monticciolo / Frances Buckley7-6, 6-3
2025-05-09vs StarckeWon 21
L#1 DoublesDeirdre Ettus / Sarah Bowen vs Maryna Lytnieva / Sanae Oyama Diller3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSondra Glueck / Kristen Cassidy vs Gina Hagedorn / Diann Starcke6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDevon Carroll / Amy Haynor vs Lynn Barker / Paddi Hurley6-4, 6-2
2025-04-27vs StarckeWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeirdre Ettus / Samantha Perri vs Maya Tribble / Renee Lemmerman6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCara Disabato / Kristen Cassidy vs Misha Monticciolo / Merri Laffitte6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Soper / Melissa Thomas vs Frances Buckley / Lynn Barker3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-04-04vs StarckeWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Einhorn / Sarah Bowen vs Gina Hagedorn / Renee Lemmerman6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJoyce Narciso-Raikos / Antonella Karlin vs Diann Starcke / Joanne Persico6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMarsha Silverman / Devon Carroll vs Misha Monticciolo / Frances Buckley2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-03-23vs StarckeWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Bowen / Samantha Perri vs Maya Tribble / Maryna Lytnieva6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAntonella Karlin / Joyce Narciso-Raikos vs Diann Starcke / Gina Hagedorn6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Soper / Melissa Thomas vs Troy Holt / Paddi Hurley6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0,4.5,4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Sarah Bowen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.57
Deirdre Ettus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.42
Antonella Karlin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.38
Sondra Glueck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Francesca Roth
published 4.5
4.19
Joyce Narciso-Raikos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Cara Disabato
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Amy Haynor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.91
Jennifer Soper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Kim Pflaumer
published 4.5
3.87
Kristen Cassidy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Devon Carroll
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Beth Mercante
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Marsha Silverman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Alyssa Bonadonna
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.35
Melissa Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Einhorn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Turnblacer
published
Samantha Perri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Bacey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Soper + Melissa Thomas39661% games+9.9% vs expected
Francesca Roth + Kim Pflaumer5262% games+8.5% vs expected
Joyce Narciso-Raikos + Antonella Karlin7158% games+3.9% vs expected
Sondra Glueck + Kristen Cassidy3358% games+3.0% vs expected
Devon Carroll + Amy Haynor6259% games+2.2% vs expected
Deirdre Ettus + Sarah Bowen6356% games+0.2% vs expected
Kim Pflaumer + Cara Disabato181849% games−0.9% vs expected
Alyssa Bonadonna + Kim Pflaumer61144% games−1.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Bowen
50W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.58
5
Deirdre Ettus
29W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.57
4.5
Antonella Karlin
153W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
4.42
4.5
Sondra Glueck
182W–103L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
4.38
4.5
Francesca Roth
104W–94L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Joyce Narciso-Raikos
45W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Cara Disabato
70W–41L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Amy Haynor
75W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.94
4
Jennifer Soper
225W–89L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
4.5
Kim Pflaumer
133W–124L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.90
Kristen Cassidy
61W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.87
4
Devon Carroll
106W–108L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Beth Mercante
32W–44L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
4
Marsha Silverman
56W–74L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Alyssa Bonadonna
128W–128L career · 1 line in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
Melissa Thomas
186W–77L career · 2 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.35
Jennifer Einhorn
51W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Turnblacer
23W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Samantha Perri
21W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Bacey
55W–66L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.