Teams

Todd

2025 Lubbock Adult League 18 & Over · 2.5 Ladies

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-06vs EubanksLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaci Griffin / Brittany Todd vs Kathy Eubanks / Jayme Pearson6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJessica Gray vs Yooneui Kim1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSydney Farris / Jera Gentry vs Paige Homen / Katie Kamper6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-29vs EubanksLost 03
L#1 DoublesNatalie Butler / Erin Hornaday vs Kathy Eubanks / Jayme Pearson0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Bevers vs Katie Kamper0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJera Gentry / Sarah Durham vs Mackenzie Kirkpatrick / Kristina Edwards4-6, 4-6
2025-04-22vs EubanksWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaci Griffin / Erin Hornaday vs Kathy Eubanks / Paige Homen6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSydney Farris vs Jayme Pearson6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJera Gentry / Brittany Todd vs Yooneui Kim / Kristina Edwards2-6, 1-6
2025-04-15vs EubanksLost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Bevers / Sydney Farris vs Katie Kamper / Paige Homen2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKaci Griffin vs Kristina Edwards6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBrittany Todd / Shannon Yarbrough vs Yooneui Kim / Mackenzie Kirkpatrick0-6, 3-6
2025-04-08vs EubanksLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrittany Todd / Sarah Durham vs Kathy Eubanks / Jayme Pearson0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesShannon Yarbrough vs Paige Homen6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNatalie Butler / Jessica Gray vs Mackenzie Kirkpatrick / Yooneui Kim0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.64
Kaci Griffin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.52
Sydney Farris
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.29
Jera Gentry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Shannon Yarbrough
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Erin Hornaday
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Jessica Gray
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.07
Brittany Todd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.94
Natalie Butler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sarah Bevers
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sarah Durham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kaci Griffin
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
Sydney Farris
8W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52
Jera Gentry
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.29
Shannon Yarbrough
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Erin Hornaday
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Gray
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.25
2.5
Brittany Todd
3W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Natalie Butler
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Sarah Bevers
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Durham
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.