Teams

Kemon - All About That Ace

2025 Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over Weekend 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.14 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-27vs Hunsicker - Rally CatsLost 01
L#3 DoublesLaura McNicholl / Charlene Sloan vs Ingrid Hunsicker / Cheryl Arnold1-6, 1-6
2025-07-19vs Hunsicker - Rally CatsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKim McCool / Kate Trask vs Linda Dinga / Cheryl Arnold6-2, 6-3
2025-06-29vs Hunsicker - Rally CatsWon 20
W#1 SinglesJJ Herbert vs Kristin Quinn6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLaura McNicholl / Kate Trask vs Dawn Arruda / Ingrid Hunsicker6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-06-28Won 20
W#1 DoublesRenee Martin / JJ Herbert vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesElisa Joyner / Kate Trask vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-21vs Hunsicker - Rally CatsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJJ Herbert vs Ingrid Hunsicker6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKate Trask / Kim McCool vs Shannon Leigh / Sue Nilsson5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over Weekend 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
JJ Herbert
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Jill Vaughan
published
3.25
Anna Allen
published 3.5
2.99
Freda Moore
published
2.98
Amy Kemon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Renee Martin
published
2.83
Elisa Joyner
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.73
Kim McCool
published
2.70
Karen Keller
published
2.69
Charlene Sloan
published 3
2.69
Laura McNicholl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Kate Trask
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.44
Janet Bailey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Vaughan + JJ Herbert6162% games+9.5% vs expected
Elisa Joyner + Amy Kemon5753% games+2.9% vs expected
Laura McNicholl + Kate Trask171945% games+2.4% vs expected
Kate Trask + Elisa Joyner6263% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
JJ Herbert
108W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.57
Jill Vaughan
22W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Anna Allen
29W–21L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Freda Moore
36W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Amy Kemon
87W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Renee Martin
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Elisa Joyner
56W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Kim McCool
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Karen Keller
6W–16L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Charlene Sloan
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Laura McNicholl
92W–115L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Kate Trask
121W–135L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Janet Bailey
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%67%33%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.