Teams

Walker/18's/3.5/PAC Night

2026 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Night

14 players · average NTRP 3.36 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrooke Brown / Lindsey Rogers vs Melisa Keo / Taylor Fernandez2-6
2026-03-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLindsey Rogers / Brooke Brown vs Rachel Mauti / Daysi Valencia0-6, 0-6
2026-03-17vs Caswell/18's/3.5/NC NightWon 10
W#1 DoublesAbby Hunt / Lindsey Rogers vs Kaitlyn Wells / Chantel Freeman6-0, 6-3
2026-03-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesLindsey Rogers / Danielle Roussel vs Marie Luke / Jessica Smith7-6, 6-0
2026-02-24Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLindsey Rogers vs Yang Pan5-7, 2-6
2026-02-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesAbby Hunt / Lindsey Rogers vs Marie Luke / Mary Elise Schof6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Enk/18's/3.5/COQ Night102431741449
2Walker/18's/3.5/PAC Night66303068546
3Luke/18's/3.5/SC Night66273370537
4Caswell/18's/3.5/NC Night210204085599

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Abby Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 3.5
3.32
Amber Mata
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
3.27
Brooke Brown
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published 3.5
3.21
Dana Gegenheimer
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.17
Ann Boushie
usually #1 Doubles 49%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 3
3.05
Danielle Roussel
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.05
Ana Perdigao
usually #1 Singles 31%, also #2 Singles 23% · published 3
Elizabeth Guidotti
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published
Erin Lorio
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Jeanne Woodrick
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Laura Lucas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Lindsey Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Stephanie Songy
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published
Taylor Bouche
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Songy + Abby Hunt5062% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Songy + Ann Boushie134 matchesnot enough data
Erin Lorio + Abby Hunt404 matchesnot enough data
Erin Lorio + Amber Mata123 matchesnot enough data
Amber Mata + Abby Hunt213 matchesnot enough data
Laura Lucas + Ann Boushie213 matchesnot enough data
Brooke Brown + Taylor Bouche303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Abby Hunt
36W–9L career · 28 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.61
3.5
Amber Mata
19W–29L career · 26 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Brooke Brown
22W–6L career · 18 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Dana Gegenheimer
6W–19L career · type A · 8 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3
Ann Boushie
47W–18L career · 34 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
3.5
Danielle Roussel
16W–11L career · 16 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.05
3
Ana Perdigao
12W–13L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.05
Elizabeth Guidotti
9W–21L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Erin Lorio
22W–17L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeanne Woodrick
10W–21L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Lucas
13W–10L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lindsey Rogers
10W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Songy
17W–22L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Taylor Bouche
21W–6L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.