Teams

Racquet Club 2

2025 Winter Combo · 2025 Winter Combo 7.5 WOMEN Monday

14 players · average NTRP 3.86 / OHIO VALLEY

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-12vs Wickertree 1Won 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Hatcher / Brooke Farber vs Brenda Hill / Medha Sutliff6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmber Scott / MacKenzie Skellan vs Elizabeth Yassenoff / Elizabeth Thomas6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlyson Thompson / Katherine Cain vs Beth Hackworth / Kim Dick6-3, 6-3
2025-05-05vs ScarboroughWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrooke Farber / Sarah Hatcher vs Caroline Cohn / Ginny Schlonsky1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPaula Gilmour / Alyson Thompson vs Natasha Petroff / Jessica Byers1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKatherine Cain / Tristin Rausch vs Mara Ackermann Ziminski / Alexandra Lerg7-6, 4-2
2025-04-28vs The Players ClubLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlyson Thompson / Emily Craig vs Barbie Stefanini / Kris Susa3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJill Mizer / Brooke Farber vs Yuko Seitz / Fujiko Itabashi7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAnneliese Adkinson / Paula Gilmour vs Lindsey Stewart / Lori Brown5-7, 3-5
2025-04-14vs Elysium 1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDanielle Milliken / Aimee White vs Jodi Rhodes / Patricia Mazurek5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmber Scott / MacKenzie Skellan vs Melissa Grether / Christie Heinlen1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaula Gilmour / Brooke Farber vs Wendy Mikola / Amanda Mathis5-7, 4-6
2025-04-07vs Wickertree 1Won 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Hatcher / Brooke Farber vs Medha Sutliff / Brenda Hill7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlyson Thompson / Tristin Rausch vs Eileen Pewitt / Julie Dixon6-4, 5-4
L#3 DoublesJill Mizer / Laura Raish vs Mary McGuff / Elizabeth Thomas6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-31vs ScarboroughWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Craig / Danielle Milliken vs Shannon Girardi / Caroline Cohn6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAimee White / Alyson Thompson vs Laura Ritter / Yvette DeLisio6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaula Gilmour / Alison Scott vs Ginny Schlonsky / Jennifer Snook6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 Winter Combo 7.5 WOMEN Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Danielle Milliken
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Anneliese Adkinson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Jill Mizer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Emily Craig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Alyson Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.48
Amber Scott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Brooke Farber
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.42
MacKenzie Skellan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Paula Gilmour
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Aimee White
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Tristin Rausch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Laura Raish
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Katherine Cain
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sarah Hatcher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anneliese Adkinson + Alyson Thompson4260% games+13.0% vs expected
Anneliese Adkinson + Jill Mizer5268% games+10.9% vs expected
Paula Gilmour + Laura Raish7359% games+10.3% vs expected
Amber Scott + Brooke Farber5263% games+9.9% vs expected
Danielle Milliken + Sarah Hatcher17264% games+9.3% vs expected
Paula Gilmour + Brooke Farber221257% games+9.1% vs expected
Danielle Milliken + Alyson Thompson5165% games+6.2% vs expected
Paula Gilmour + Amber Scott6357% games+5.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Danielle Milliken
180W–103L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Anneliese Adkinson
61W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Jill Mizer
93W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Emily Craig
49W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Alyson Thompson
109W–51L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Amber Scott
146W–86L career · 2 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Brooke Farber
167W–89L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
MacKenzie Skellan
141W–55L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
Paula Gilmour
223W–148L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Aimee White
44W–43L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tristin Rausch
122W–45L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Laura Raish
84W–66L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Katherine Cain
145W–105L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.16
Sarah Hatcher
118W–25L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.