Teams

Plumlee/MH/LR&F

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring League 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-01vs OATES/RUSSELLVILLEWon 31
W#1 DoublesChristina Decker / Heather Maxey vs Schelle Fike / Amy Lynch7-5, 3-4
L#1 SinglesBianca Talbot vs Caroline Howse3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKelley Nosari / Cara Barber vs Milli Stanley / Robbie Rutherford6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHayley Plumlee / Kaitlin Skinner vs Kharyssa Brown / Bernadette Stanford6-1, 6-1
2025-03-01vs OATES/RUSSELLVILLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelley Nosari / Heather Maxey vs Schelle Fike / Ellie Karvoski6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBianca Talbot vs Kharyssa Brown6-5, 4-4
W#2 DoublesHayley Plumlee / Kaitlin Skinner vs Melissa Oates / Amy Lynch6-3, 6-3
2025-02-01vs OATES/RUSSELLVILLEWon 41
L#1 DoublesCara Barber / Christina Decker vs Amy Lynch / Deanna Garretson2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKaitlin Skinner vs Ellie Karvoski7-5, 2-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Webb / Soria Talbot vs Melissa Oates / Robbie Rutherford6-1, 5-5
W#2 SinglesHeather Maxey vs Caroline Howse6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKelley Nosari / Amy McKay vs Milli Stanley / Bernadette Stanford6-3, 6-2
2025-01-31vs OATES/RUSSELLVILLEWon 41
W#1 DoublesKelley Nosari / Christina Decker vs Amy Lynch / Schelle Fike6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKaitlin Skinner vs Bernadette Stanford6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCara Barber / Amy McKay vs Ellie Karvoski / Melissa Oates3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesHeather Maxey vs Caroline Howse6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichelle Webb / Soria Talbot vs Milli Stanley / Robbie Rutherford6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Hayley Plumlee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.54
Kaitlin Skinner
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.44
Cara Barber
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Amy McKay
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Christina Decker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Bianca Talbot
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Heather Maxey
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kelley Nosari
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Soria Talbot
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hayley Plumlee
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Kaitlin Skinner
6W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Cara Barber
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Amy McKay
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Christina Decker
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Bianca Talbot
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Heather Maxey
7W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelley Nosari
11W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Soria Talbot
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.