Teams

WRECK TENNIS

2023 Virginia Beach Combo · Virginia Beach Combo 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-09-13vs SERVE AND SIZZLEWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Camden / Rebecca Newton vs Adrian Allred / NATALIE ASHCRAFT6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlyse Chickey / Megan Farr vs Tiffany Curran / Madeline Fiore6-2, 6-1
2023-08-30vs SERVE AND SIZZLEWon 10
W#2 DoublesErin Camden / Alyse Chickey vs Tiffany Curran / NATALIE ASHCRAFT6-2, 6-0
2023-08-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesLori Cox / Alyse Chickey vs Madeline Fiore / Adrian Allred6-2, 6-1
2023-08-09vs SERVE AND SIZZLEWon 10
W#2 DoublesErin Camden / Rebecca Newton vs Madeline Fiore / NATALIE ASHCRAFT6-2, 6-3
2023-08-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesErin Camden / Alyse Chickey vs Veronique Iverson / Madeline Fiore6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Virginia Beach Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Lori Cox
published
3.56
Alyse Chickey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.47
Elizabeth Peterson
published 3.5
3.43
Megan Farr
published
3.37
Paige Caporicci
published
3.35
Erin Camden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Rebecca Newton
published
2.92
Kimberly Cummings
published
2.86
Andrea Keller
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alyse Chickey + Elizabeth Peterson7654% games+3.8% vs expected
Erin Camden + Alyse Chickey5069% gamesnot enough data
Megan Farr + Erin Camden134 matchesnot enough data
Paige Caporicci + Megan Farr303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Cox
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
3.5
Alyse Chickey
98W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Elizabeth Peterson
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
Megan Farr
23W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.43
Paige Caporicci
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Erin Camden
141W–91L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.35
Rebecca Newton
12W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Kimberly Cummings
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Andrea Keller
10W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.