Teams

Klitz/40's/3.0AW/Mac

2025 Monroe Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.0 Monroe (40&O) Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-06vs Raymond/40's/3.0AW/ForLost 04
L#1 DoublesJessica Stutts / Kelly Rutz vs Sarah Raymond / Brandee Yarbrough0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesStacey Majure vs Cindy Gibson1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Livigni / Kristy Rizzo vs Aimee Hayward / Anna Robinson1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesEleanor Funderburk / Amy Fakhre vs Amy Robinson / Tiffany Turpin6-7, 3-6
2025-04-04vs Raymond/40's/3.0AW/ForLost 04
L#1 DoublesLisa Livigni / Kristy Rizzo vs Anna Robinson / Tiffany Turpin1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Fakhre vs Amy Robinson4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesStacey Majure / Jennifer Turpin vs Andree Eddleman / Felicia Hardwick1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesErin Klitzke / Eleanor Funderburk vs Cindy Gibson / Mary Durham1-6, 0-6
2025-04-03vs Raymond/40's/3.0AW/ForLost 04
L#1 DoublesErin Klitzke / Eleanor Funderburk vs Felicia Hardwick / Mary Durham1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Turpin vs Tiffany Turpin0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Stutts / Kelly Rutz vs Sarah Raymond / Brandee Yarbrough0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Livigni / Kristy Rizzo vs Andree Eddleman / Aimee Hayward1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Monroe (40&O) Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Fakhre
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.44
Erin Klitzke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.29
Jessica Stutts
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Eleanor Funderburk
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Turpin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Kelly Rutz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kristy Rizzo
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lisa Livigni
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Stacey Majure
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Livigni + Kristy Rizzo033 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Stutts + Erin Klitzke033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy Fakhre
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Erin Klitzke
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.44
Jessica Stutts
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.29
Eleanor Funderburk
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Turpin
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Rutz
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristy Rizzo
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Livigni
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacey Majure
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.