Teams

TTA GREEN

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-04vs RCC GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesIan Harris / Philip Dixon-Patterson vs John Hamill / Andrew Hefter3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-08-01vs RCC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesIan Harris / Philip Dixon-Patterson vs Alex Pedersen / Sam Granberry6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-07-25vs RMTC YELLOWWon 10
W#1 DoublesPhilip Dixon-Patterson / Ian Harris vs Azur Ali / Joshua Harrison6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brian Giesecke
published 4.5
4.24
Steven Alvarado
published
4.23
Eric Jaggers
published
4.21
Ian Harris
published
4.12
Anthony Garcia
published 4.5
4.11
Marcel de Graaf
published 4.5
4.08
Philip Dixon-Patterson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcel de Graaf + Anthony Garcia4452% games+0.8% vs expected
Anthony Garcia + Ian Harris5649% games+0.2% vs expected
Philip Dixon-Patterson + Ian Harris91447% games−1.8% vs expected
Marcel de Graaf + Philip Dixon-Patterson3447% games−3.9% vs expected
Marcel de Graaf + Eric Jaggers8846% games−5.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Giesecke
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Alvarado
13W–15L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
4.24
Eric Jaggers
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Ian Harris
20W–21L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
Anthony Garcia
13W–20L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
4.12
4.5
Marcel de Graaf
28W–41L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.11
4.5
Philip Dixon-Patterson
62W–81L career · 3 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
4.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.