Teams

Mills - Prieto

2026 Duval Trilevel 18 & Over Women - Summer · 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-27vs Baymeadows - AndersenWon 21
L#1 DoublesJill Jabot / Mani Prieto vs Jenni Westbrook / Gigi Mulhern6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEmily Silva / Maria Dekar vs Rosemarie Prokop / Anna Hastings6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGale Joy / Olesia Antoniuk vs Sabrina Bouska Butler / Narong Khan6-4, 6-1
2026-08-20vs FYC - KaneWon 21
W#1 DoublesCheryl Moody / Jill Jabot vs Beth Kane / Lani Baruch6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMaria Dekar / Emily Silva vs Phoebe Kashmanian / Angela Crum6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCorbie Yee / Casey Ragland vs Kathryn Keefe / Katrina Torres3-6, 3-6
2026-08-13vs Timuquana - LovelaceWon 21
L#1 DoublesNina Strickland / Ann Tiefenthaler vs Maggie Williams / Marcela Beard0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMaria Dekar / Susan Asher vs Emily Painter / Katherine Kidd6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesOlesia Antoniuk / Julie Clampitt vs Leah Copham / Brittany Jones7-5, 7-5
2026-08-06vs Sawgrass - WrightWon 30
W#1 DoublesJill Jabot / Nina Strickland vs Terry Heard / Julie Barney4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKim Loferski / Ann Tiefenthaler vs Lindsay Long / Christina Felsing6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCorbie Yee / Olesia Antoniuk vs Betsy Delcour / Tulin Lopez6-3, 6-1
2026-07-23vs FYC - KaneWon 21
W#1 DoublesMani Prieto / Jill Jabot vs Beth Kane / Amy Buckley6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKendall Taylor / Susan Asher vs Shields Hoida / Tammy Morreale4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJulie Clampitt / Olesia Antoniuk vs Ashli Nixon / Renee' Kirkland6-3, 7-6
2026-07-16vs Baymeadows - AndersenWon 21
L#1 DoublesCheryl Moody / Amanda Swearingen vs Gigi Mulhern / Jenni Westbrook4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKendall Taylor / Maria Dekar vs Traunia Senior / Rosemarie Prokop6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesOlesia Antoniuk / Gale Joy vs Simona Gavaller / Anna Harper6-1, 6-2
2026-07-09vs Planet Swim - GambardellaWon 30
W#1 DoublesJill Jabot / Amanda Swearingen vs Emily Pierson / Meghan Spencer6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Asher / Maria Dekar vs Alexis Gambardella / Sarah Merritt6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesOlesia Antoniuk / Corbie Yee vs Lisa Beauregard / Pamela Postell6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mills - Prieto6014411132
2San Jose - Hennessy5111715134
3St. John's Golf - Bushman5112617148
4Glen Kernan - Kozack4213514149
5Baymeadows - Andersen3381022176
6Yards - McKillop2471122168
7Kraft - Colwell2481023165
8FYC - Kane2481024187
9Planet Swim - Gambardella1561227187
10Sawgrass - Wright1551327188
11Plantation - Pensotti0631531202

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Jill Jabot
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.84
Amanda Swearingen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Cheryl Moody
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Mani Prieto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Susan Asher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Maria Dekar
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.54
Emily Silva
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Olesia Antoniuk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Ann Tiefenthaler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Kendall Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Kim Loferski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Stacey Hartley
published
3.08
Corbie Yee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.07
Gale Joy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Julie Clampitt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nina Strickland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mani Prieto + Susan Asher4256% games+1.4% vs expected
Mani Prieto + Jill Jabot314 matchesnot enough data
Kendall Taylor + Jill Jabot314 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Swearingen + Maria Dekar123 matchesnot enough data
Ann Tiefenthaler + Kim Loferski213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Jabot
37W–8L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Amanda Swearingen
103W–71L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Cheryl Moody
27W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Mani Prieto
24W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.68
Susan Asher
11W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.61
Maria Dekar
26W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.56
3.5
Emily Silva
20W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
Olesia Antoniuk
18W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Ann Tiefenthaler
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Kendall Taylor
19W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Kim Loferski
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.19
Stacey Hartley
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
3
Corbie Yee
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.08
3
Gale Joy
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
Julie Clampitt
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Nina Strickland
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.