Teams

Bullard - Highland Country Club

2025 Sandhills Adult 18 & over · 2.5 Adult Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-05vs Miller - Highland Country ClubLost 12
W#1 DoublesKatie Bullard / Anne Catherine Williams vs Lyndsey Gardner / Courtney Samuelson6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCourtney McDaniel vs Allene Bullock0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMadeline McFadyen / Tyler Chavonne vs Susan Miller / Taylor England1-6, 2-6
2025-04-21vs Long - MazarickWon 10
W#2 DoublesLia Ernst / Andrea Jacobs vs Christina Griggs / Theresa Jones6-4, 6-3
2025-03-31vs Miller - Highland Country ClubWon 10
W#1 SinglesLia Ernst vs Courtney Samuelson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-24vs Miller - Highland Country ClubLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnne Catherine Williams / Tyler Chavonne vs Maddie Cohen / Meredith Wermel6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTaylor Henrickson vs Lyndsey Gardner0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCasie Burgos / Anna Owen vs Reston Chambers / Jessica Smith1-6, 3-6
2025-03-03vs Long - MazarickLost 01
L#2 DoublesLia Ernst / Victoria Stout vs Mari Lesniak / Christina Griggs6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-02-24Won 10
W#1 SinglesLia Ernst vs Lisa Long6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Anna Owen
published 2.5
3.36
Andrea Jacobs
published 3
3.29
Victoria Stout
published
2.79
Tyler Chavonne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Anne Catherine Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Lia Ernst
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.66
Madeline McFadyen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Katie Bullard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.94
Courtney McDaniel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
1.91
Casie Burgos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Michelle Pecko
published
Taylor Henrickson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tyler Chavonne + Katie Bullard7357% games+7.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Anna Owen
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.47
3
Andrea Jacobs
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
Victoria Stout
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.29
Tyler Chavonne
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Anne Catherine Williams
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Lia Ernst
35W–23L career · 11 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Madeline McFadyen
18W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%11%89%
2.66
Katie Bullard
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%<1%
2.64
2.5
Courtney McDaniel
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.94
2.5
Casie Burgos
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Michelle Pecko
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Taylor Henrickson
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.