Teams

IND-Peak Northwest

2021 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-05-29vs CBRC-NewsomWon 30
W#1 DoublesSherry Varner / Terri Ruthruff vs Linda Miles / Huijuan Zhang6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Temby / Kathleen Maple vs Sarah Burton / Nancy Lauck6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJanie Slater / Lisa Marks vs Lory Allen / Mary Lipton6-3, 6-2
2021-05-29vs WRAC-GoetschWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatti Marvel / Karen Henderson vs Kelley Quinn / Debra Miller4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Temby / Sherry Varner vs Donna Parsons / Maureen Woodward7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJanie Slater / Lisa Marks vs Darillyn Flones / Elizabeth Linnell6-0, 6-4
2021-05-28vs CBRC-NewsomWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatti Marvel / Karen Henderson vs Nancy Lauck / Carole Kupsh6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura Temby / Sherry Varner vs Sarah Burton / Sidney Newsom6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJanie Slater / Lisa Marks vs Huijuan Zhang / Lory Allen6-2, 6-1
2021-05-28vs WRAC-GoetschWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatti Marvel / Karen Henderson vs Kelley Quinn / Darillyn Flones6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Temby / Kathleen Maple vs Maureen Woodward / Debra Miller5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSherry Varner / Terri Ruthruff vs Jennifer Carlson / Elizabeth Linnell7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 7.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IND-Peak Northwest40120373
2SC-Middle Skittles3081562
3PC-Koehler21541078
4WRAC-Goetsch22661397
5YTC-Donahue12361271
6GAC-Gorge Athletic032715104
7CBRC-Newsom0401224142

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Terri Ruthruff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Patti Marvel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Karen Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Janie Slater
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Maple
published
Laura Temby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Marks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sherry Varner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patti Marvel + Karen Henderson642357% games+1.1% vs expected
Terri Ruthruff + Sherry Varner35961% games+0.4% vs expected
Lisa Marks + Janie Slater5166% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Terri Ruthruff
95W–46L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Patti Marvel
106W–48L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
Karen Henderson
57W–24L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
Janie Slater
18W–13L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathleen Maple
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Laura Temby
78W–51L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa Marks
25W–20L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sherry Varner
81W–48L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.